Acting as a conduit for communication between the ranger staff of the Ozark National Forest Service in Arkansas, and the rock climbing and camping community using the Sams Throne special interest area. Why?
Decision Notice   |   EA Report   |   Maps   |   Forums   |   Submit Your Thoughts   |   Directions   |   Links

   NFS Decision Notice

 


DECISION NOTICE
and
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Sam's Throne Campground and Forest Plan Amendment
U.S.D.A. Forest Service
Ozark National Forest
Buffalo Ranger District
Newton County, Arkansas

 

On February 17, 2001 Forest Supervisor Charles Richmond selected Alternative B of the Sam's Throne Project Environmental Assessment. This Alternative will:

Establish a fee demonstration area with forty designated primitive campsites.

Establish two parking areas, each with a 40-car capacity.

Construct a new loop road to access the 20 sites on the north end of the ridge.

Locate a vault toilet on each end of the ridge.

Place water bars, leadoff ditches, and a gate along the main access road that goes to the south end of the ridge.

Improve and gate the road along the base of the south bluff line for emergency access.

Improve two trails and incorporate the existing trails into the District's trail system.

Conduct a prescribed burn on the ridgetop.

Restrict camping to the designated campsites within the Sam's Throne Special Interest Area.


The construction of the loop road will require amending the Forest Plan since road construction was not allowed within the Mangement Area applied to Sam's Throne. This is not considered a significant amendment because there are no major rescource impacts from its construction and the road does not in any way impair the values for which the area was so designated. The road will help to protect those values by dispersing the existing camping use. It is also consistent with 36 CFR 294.1a and Forest Service Manual 2360.2 which states in part "foster public use and enjoyment of areas with scenic, historical, geological, zoological, palentological, or other special characteristics."
This decision is subject to appeal pursuant to 36 CFR 215.7. A written Notice of Appeal must be postmarked or received within 45 days after the date this notice is published in the Newton County Times, Jasper, Arkansas. The Notice of Appeal must be sent to: USDA, Forest Service, Southern Region, ATTN: Appeals Deciding Officer, 1720 Peachtree Road, N.W., Suite 816N, Atlanta, GA 30367-9102. Appeals must meet content requirements of 35 CFR 215.14. For further information on this decision, contact: Terry Hope, District Resource Assistant, Buffalo Ranger District, P.O. Box 427, Jasper, Arkansas 72641 or call (870) 446-5122
If no appeal is received, implementation of this decision may occur on, but not before, 5 business days from the close of the appeal filing period. If an appeal is received, implementation may not occur for 15 days following the date of appeal disposition.


The Sam's Throne Project Environmental Assessment (EA) documents the analysis of a Proposed Action and four alternatives. The EA is on file at the Buffalo Ranger District, Jasper, AR.
It is my decision to select Alternative B. This alternative does two things. It implements the actions proposed in the Alternative, and provides the basis for Forest Plan Amendment# 10. This amendment allows construction of a road to the proposed campground in the Sam's Throne SIA. (See amendment# 10, appendix c).
I have determined that this is not a significant amendment to the Forest Plan under 36 CFR 219.10 (f). I make this determination based on Forest Service Handbook 1909.12, Section 5.32 that provides four criteria for assessing the significance of a Forest Plan amendment.

Timing

This action will take place within the next year, during the current planning period. A forest plan revision will not start for another 2-3 years; the action can't wait for the revision process to be completed.

Location and Size

This action only occurs in one small portion of the Sam's Throne SIA. It doesn't apply to any other SIA's allocated to Management Area 7 of the forest plan.

Goals, Objectives, and Outputs

This amendment does not alter the levels of goods and services projected by the Forest Plan.

Management Prescription

This amendment does not significantly change any management prescription contained in the Forest Plan. The change is for this SIA only, and not the rest of the SIA's covered under Management Area 7. Applying this amendment does not alter the desired future condition of the land and resources found in the Forest Plan, or the anticipated goods and services to be produced.

It does not in any way impair the values for which the area was so designated. The road will help to protect those values by dispersing the existing camping use. It is also consistent with 36 CFR 294.1a and Forest Service Manual 2360.2 which states in part "foster public use and enjoyment of areas with scenic, historical, geological, zoological, palentological, or other special characteristics".
This decision is based on the analysis described in the EA, the comments received from interested individuals and on the Forest Service response to these comments as documented in Appendix B of the EA.

The alternatives considered in detail were:
Proposed Action:

Establish a fee demonstration area (the fee would be between $3-5/site) on top of the main ridge with forty designated primitive campsites broken into two sections. The south portion of the ridge would have 20 "pack it in, pack it out" sites where no vehicles would be allowed. The north portion would have 20 sites accessible by vehicle.

Construct a new loop road to access the 20 sites on the north end of the ridge.

Locate a vault toilet on each end of the ridge.

Place water bars and leadoff ditches along the main access road that goes to the south end of the ridge and allowing administration access only.

Improve the road along the base of the bluff line so an ATV can access the area for any emergencies. The road would be gated and only administrative or medical emergency use would be allowed.

Develop a helispot between the Throne and bluff line to facilitate medical evacuation.

Improve the two social trails (Dog Walkdown and Catacomb Walkdown) and incorporate the existing trails into the District's trail system.

Establish two parking areas 60 feet by 200 feet one for campers of the "Pack it in, Pack it out" and the other for day use parking, each with a 40-car capacity.

Restrict camping to the designated campsites only within the Sam's Throne Special Interest Area.

Thin the pine stand on the southern portion of the ridge top and conduct a prescribed burn on top of the ridge prior to the development of the campsites.

Alternative A - No Action

There would not be any improvements made to the existing dispersed camping area.

Alternative B - No Thin

This alternative would have the same activities as described in the proposed action with three exceptions. First, there would not be any timber thinning conducted. Second, the helispot would be moved to the junction of the lower road and Highway 123. Third, the prescribed fire would be conducted only one time.


My decision is based upon the following:
1. I believe Alternative B best fulfills the purpose and need described in the EA.
2. All adverse environmental impacts can and will be successfully mitigated.
3. It successfully addresses the issues in the EA by:
(a) Reducing the amount and extent of soil compaction and vegetative loss by dispersing the camping impacts over a larger area and halting the spread of user created campsites and roads,
(b) Improving the recreational setting by establishing a consistent sight distance between campsites, allows for either a primitive or vehicular camping experience, improves sanitation, maintains the current vegetative condition, and provides for emergency personnel access.

Alternatives Considered But Not Selected
Alternative A - No Action
This Alternative did not address the fact the existing conditions are exceeding the Forest Plan's threshold for soil disturbance in dispersed recreational areas.
Proposed Action
This Alternative was not selected for two reasons. One, it was determined that thinning the pine would provide minimal enhancement to the aesthetics of the site at this time. Second, given the number of instances requiring emergency evacuation in the recent past, I determined that there was no need to construct the helispot by the Throne. The helispot on the highway would be adequate to meet the rescue needs we have experienced in the past.

Public Involvement
The proposal was mailed out to 32 individuals and placed in the Forest's Schedule of Proposed Actions (SPA) report. The SPA report is sent to over 500 individuals who have expressed interest in Forest Service management. From this effort a total of five responses were received, all of them favorable for the general intent, but concerned about certain portions of the proposal (e.g., need for the helispot, impacts from the thinning, location of the "pack in/pack out" area). All comments received are included in the analysis file.
Because of the high interest in the area, a series of public meetings were held: Fayetteville on 2/26/00 - 10 people, Springfield on 6/1/00 - 80 people, Fayetteville on 7/1/00 - 5 people, informal polling of 20 campers in spring of 1999, and a field trip on 4/23/99 for 8 people. As was the case with the written comments, very few responses were completely against the proposal; instead, the need for the project was recognized with some negative reactions to particular portions of the proposal (e.g., fees, not wanting to have the proposal result in drawing even more people to the area, location of the helispots). (EA, Appendix B).
The Predecisional EA was sent to the two climbing gyms where previous public meetings were held and to those that had expressed interested in receiving the document from those public meetings. This resulted in a total of 25 copies being distributed. This yielded one response. In addition, an individual approached the District and volunteered to develop a web site that had the EA on it and a way for people to respond to it. The site was linked to the two gym's web sites. There were 10 timely responses received from this effort and one that was late (it was reviewed and found not to contain any additional information from that already received). Appendix B has the consolidated comments and the District's responses.

Findings Required by Other Laws and Regulations
1. This project will fully comply with state approved BMPs and the Clean Water Act by improving the southern access road and emergency access road, rehabilitating the exisitng campsites.
2. By amending the Forest Plan, the actions of this project are consistent with the Plan's Management Direction for Special Interest Areas (pp. 4-32 to 4-34). The project is feasible and reasonable, and it results in applying management practices that meet the Plan's overall direction of protecting the environment while producing goods and services.

Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
Based upon the following rationale, and how they relate to the CEQ Regulations (40 CFR 1508.27), I have determined that implementation of Alternative B will not have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore an Environmental Impact Statement is not required.
  • According to the EA (p. 11) and Biological Evaluation (in process file), the actions are not likely to adverse affect any threatened or endangered species or their critical habitat. See section 1508.27(b)(9) of the CEQ Regulations.
  • The project will not significantly affect any unique characteristics of the geographic area such as proximity to historic or cultural resources, wetlands, floodplains, wild and scenic rivers, or ecologically critical areas (EA pp. 5 - 11). See section 1508.27(b)(3).
  • The actions will not affect any sites listed in, or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places nor will they cause loss or destruction of significant scientific, cultural, or historic resources because a survey has already been conducted (EA p. 11) and the necessary boundary adjustments have been made. See section 1508.27(b)(8).
  • As discussed in the EA (pp. 5 - 11), there are no significant cumulative effects anticipated. The cumulative effects of the proposed actions have been analyzed with consideration of other similar activities on adjacent lands, in past actions, and in foreseeable future actions. See section 1508.27(b)(7).
  • I do not consider the proposal as "highly controversial" with respect to the nature or extent of effects. See section 1508.27(b)(4).
  • Because the actions contemplated are very similar to those, which have occurred in other portions of the Forest, I do not feel they present any highly uncertain effects or involve unique or unknown risks. See section 1508.27(b)(5).
  • There are no effects foreseen on public health or safety and this action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. See section (1508.27(b)(2)).
  • According to the EA (pp. 5 - 11), both the beneficial and adverse effects have been identified. See section 1508.27(b)(1).
  • The actions in this decision will not establish a precedent for future actions with significant effects nor does it represent a decision in principle about a future consideration. See section (1508.27(b)(6)).
  • None of the actions threaten to lead to violation of federal, state, or local laws imposed for the protection of the environment. See section (1508.27(b)(10)).

This decision is subject to appeal pursuant to 36 CFR 215.7. A written Notice of Appeal must be postmarked or received within 45 days after the date this notice is published in the Newton County Times, Jasper, Arkansas. The Notice of Appeal must be sent to: USDA, Forest Service, Southern Region, ATTN: Appeal Deciding Officer, 1720 Peachtree Road, N.W., Suite 816N, Atlanta, GA. 30367-9102.
Appeals must meet content requirements of 36 CFR 215.14. For further information on this decision contact: Terry Hope by mail at: Buffalo Ranger District, Ozark National Forest, POB 427, Jasper, AR 72641 or by phone at: (870) 446-5122.
If no appeal is received, implementation of this decision may occur on, but not before, 5 business days from the close of the appeal filing period. If an appeal is received, implementation may not occur for 15 days following the date of appeal disposition.
Charles Richmond
Forest Supervisor
Date 2/16/01
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD).
To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

 

OZARK-ST. FRANCIS NATIONAL FORESTS
LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Amendment #10
Amendment #10 amends the Ozark/St. Francis Forest Land and Resource Management Plan to allow for construction of 0.5 miles of road to access the new campground in the Sam's Throne SIA. This amendment is a non-significant amendment.
The plan is amended as follows:
Chapter 4: Forest Management Direction
Page 4-33: Facilities - Add a sentence to read: Allow construction of xxxx miles of road to the proposed campground in the Sam's Throne SIA.

 


designed, built & maintained by monkeyhead
information posted here courtesy of the ranger staff of the
Ozark National Forest
Buffalo Ranger District
Last time I got ambitious: February 19, 2004