|
|
|
Military Email Lists and Support Groups, international, national and local Links to General Military Information Family Support Organizations listed by name of Service Insight into your children's lives: Military Brats Installation Homeschooling Points of Contact
Military Recruitment and Enlistment
Adobe Reader |
Military: Section 10
of HR 3753/SB 1691, The Homeschool Non-Discrimination Act of 2005
My apologies for the length of this page. I know that few online readers stick around for detailed explanations such as this one and I would have made it shorter, but the section of the legislative bill in question is, itself, long. Because of this, the analysis is also lengthy. My additional apologies for any errors. I've tried to be as thorough as possible, and still get the information online as soon as possible. On This Page
Introduction and History return to: Federalization of Homeschooling
On the 14th of September, 2005, HSLDA announced the introduction in Congress of HR 3753/SB 1691, the Homeschool Non-Discrimination Act of 2005. If the bill is enacted as it stands, Section 10 would be a new part of public law, not a correction of existing law, and would be the first section concerning military recruitment addressing a specific population: homeschoolers. Instead of closing the federal barn door after some of the horses have already left, this one opens the barn door to invite the rest of the federal bureaucratic herd inside through the setting of precedent, including definitions of homeschooling in federal law. The point of this legislation seems to be to skirt the results of a five-year study conducted, apparently at the behest of HSLDA [note: this is how my reading of the announcement by HSLDA at their website about the Tier I status, and the subsequent release of the report by the Center for Naval Analysis (CNA), but I think the timing of the two events, with the study being dependent on the temporary Tier I status, confused me as to who was responsible for what. Given that there is no online credit claimed for the CNA study, other than CNA doing it, I now think there is no connection of the study to HSLDA. No one's talking, so I'm left to guess.] Timeline:
I'm not a lawyer by any stretch of the imagination, but just as an exercise in critical thinking, I sat down with the new section and looked at it to see if there were any obvious flaws. To my non-lawyerly eyes, there are. And as a citizen, though one without a law degree, I have conveyed my concerns to my legislators. I share them below. (For those who want to read Section 10 straight through, the text of the proposed section follows my analysis.)
Why do homeschooled teens need to be specifically mentioned in public law concerning military enlistment? No other group in the pool of entry-level servicemembers is singled out for special treatment, so why are homeschooled kids? Schooling is, to my mind, 'porous' because there is no permanent 'placement' of any child or young person in an educational structure. At any time a publicly schooled child can become privately schooled, or homeschooled, and the same can be said for the other two categories. Schooling is a process, not a placement. Aside from retention statistics, which are military-specific, there is no special characteristic that separates young citizens who were homeschooled from their peers who attended public schools, private schools, or schools overseas. Also, concerning enlistment in the military services, aside from the Tiers, there are no special categories for any demographic group.
Note that this bill is only about enlisting in the military services. Enlisting in the military services makes one an enlisted member, which seems to be obvious, but the waters are sometimes muddied by including commissioning as an officer in the mix of 'homeschooled kid in the military' discussions. This is an unnecessary complication because commissioning requires a college degree, and the degree removes DoD concern about a 'homeschooling background.'
It may be important to the homeschooled grad that she or he was homeschooled, and it may be satisfying to the homeschooling community that a homeschooler made good. But if you've got a college degree and are seeking a commission, DoD doesn't care where you went to kindergarten, which it does if you're enlisting. See also on this site: Accurately portraying military enlistment for homeschooled grads
(a) Home-Schooled Students- Chapter 31 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 503 the following new section: Sec. 503a. Recruitment and enlistment of home-schooled students A new section. Only for homeschooled kids. As if they are a group in need of assistance. Tsk.
(a) Policy on Recruitment and Enlistment- The Secretary concerned shall prescribe a policy for the recruitment and enlistment of home-schooled students. The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the polices prescribed under this section apply, to the extent practicable, uniformly across the armed forces Again with the special treatment. Why? And as for homeschooling status to be applied, "uniformly across the armed forces," well that's just out in left field because there no other group among all the citizens of the United States that gets this kind of special treatment, plus each of the services has its own criteria for recruits. Once the basic requirements have been met by a candidate, then particulars are applied.
(b) Elements- The policy prescribed by the Secretary concerned under
subsection (a) shall include the following: The system isn't broke, don't fix it. Just because some people find it harder to enter than others doesn't mean the system is broke. Men shorter than 60 inches, women shorter than 58 inches, and men or women taller than 80 are not accepted without a waiver. It is difficult for a reason, and service in the military services is not an entitlement, it is a privilege.
(2) Provision for the treatment, within the Department of Defense classification system of educational credentials for recruitment purposes, of graduates of home schooling within the same tier status as regular high school graduates, with no practical limit with regard to enlistment.
See also: Recruitment and Enlistment on this site
(3) Exemption of graduates of home schooling from any requirement for a secondary school diploma or a General Education Development (GED) certificate of high school equivalency as a precondition for enlistment in the armed forces. I'm assuming this means that the homeschoolers don't have to have a third-party verification of their homeschooling status. This is curious because that's exactly what is written into this bill further down. If it means that homeschoolers don't need to produce any diploma, then this paragraph is thoroughly unfair to the majority of recruits. If homeschool success in spelling bees triggers animosity (scroll to bottom of entry), what would something like this do?
If homeschooled graduates are singled out as the one group of potential recruits who don't have to produce any paperwork stating that they've 'graduated' there can only be a backlash. Additionally, in light of the concern about 'fake homeschoolers' enlisting in the armed forces, how would anyone know who is who? Or is that answered later in this section?
(c) Qualified Home-School Graduates- In identifying a graduate of home schooling for purposes of subsection (b), the Secretary concerned shall ensure that the graduate meets each of the following requirements: So no diploma or G.E.D. is required, but new requirements will be? How does this square with the DoD's requirements being that all 12 years of schooling be of the institutional type according to the Air Force's recruiting instruction?
(1) The graduate has taken the Armed Forces Qualification Test and scored at the 50th percentile or above. The 50th percentile score is already in place, and not very flattering since it qualifies a Tier III candidate for enlistment (scroll down to Table 2.1). Minimum AFQT/ASVAB scores for enlistment (for high school graduates)
(2) The graduate has provided the Secretary concerned with--
(B) a home-school certificate or diploma from the parent or guardian of the
graduate or a national curriculum provider.
(3) The graduate has provided the Secretary concerned with a copy of the
graduate's transcript for all secondary school grades completed which-- For all twelve years. Why is all this worth writing such requirements into public law, requirements which could easily be transferred to other pieces of legislation, or which the states could take as a model?
(B) reflects successful completion of the last full academic year of schooling from the home-school national curriculum provider, parent, or guardian issuing the home-school certificate or diploma or home-school notice of intent form. Did no one check the recruiting requirements before cobbling all of this together? The "last full academic year of schooling" doesn't count, in and of itself, if 'homeschooling' is involved. For homeschoolers, all twelve years must be 'graded' and 'taught.'
(4) The home-school curriculum used by the graduate involved parental instruction and supervision and closely patterned the normal credit hours per subject as used in a traditional secondary school. Well, it looks as if part of the requirements were read, but somehow the twelve years was glossed over.
(5) The graduate has provided the Secretary concerned with a third-party verification letter of the graduate's home-school status by the Home School Legal Defense Association or a State or county home-school association or organization.' Notice that this is not in the 'or' category. This is stand-alone, and appears to be something in addition to the preceding requirements. Homeschooled kids would have to fulfill the foregoing, and this one, too. In the Army recruiting regulation, AR 601-210,
HSLDA has fulfilled that function for some recruits, and, for families who apparently did not use an umbrella school, this would be a new layer of bureaucracy to deal with. To enter the military, a homeschooled grad who did not use an umbrella school must have third-party verification of the grad's "home-school status." Using a self-directed correspondence course puts the potential recruit back in Tier II status (which is where homeschooled recruits are still pigeonholed according to the regulation as it stands).
But concerning the "third party verification," how would the status be determined? Whose criteria would 'count?' The concept of what homeschooling 'is' is itself subjective, and has caused much ink and many electrons to be spilt during the discussion. No agreement has been reached among the homeschoolers discussing the subject, but yet here we have a paragraph that will sweep away all dissention through third-party verification. At least we'll finally know what homeschooling 'is.' As I said above, I'm not a lawyer and I also don't read many laws, or legislative bills as my 'fine-print time' is usually taken up with the backs of cans to find ingredients and health facts. Can anyone tell me if it is common practice for a specific organization (use Ctrl+F, search term = South Carolina), such as say, the Home School Legal Defense Association, to be included in the law, as a provider of services? This paragraph is reminiscent of the situation in South Carolina where validation by a third-party organization is one of the options under the law.
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter
is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 503 the following
new item:
Online links to discussions of HR 3753/ S 1691
SEC. 10. RECRUITMENT AND ENLISTMENT OF HOME-SCHOOLED STUDENTS IN THE ARMED
FORCES.
|
Homeschooling American Homeschool Association Books: Driving in the car (during field trips; PCSing; vacations)
For
New Homeschoolers Glossary of homeschooling and military terms Hobby Horse Stable: Op/ed
Schools
WayBack Machine:
(use this to find information on linked pages that have been taken off the
Web) |
|
The Military Homeschooler is a private web site and is not affiliated with the US government or the DoD. The opinions stated on the site are those of the site owner and the content is provided for information only. The Military Homeschooler contains links to other Web sites. These other sites are not under the control of The Military Homeschooler and The Military Homeschooler is not responsible for the contents of any other site. The Military Homeschooler provides the links only as a convenience to this site's readers, and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement by The Military Homeschooler of the site. You are responsible for your own viewing and any dealings with other sites. Regarding any legal opinions expressed, I am not a lawyer. If you have a legal problem, check with JAG or retain your own legal counsel. This site is optimized for Internet Explorer The Military Homeschooler
copyright 2003 - 2007 All rights reserved. All photos copyrighted by Valerie Bonham Moon unless
otherwise indicated. write to the WebMissus at:
the_military_homeschooler at hotmail . com
This site was last updated: Friday, 15 February 2008
|