A High Tech translation of Religion and Myth, combined with our present High Tech Science knowledge, will give a Literal understanding of the High Tech in our Past. Our High Tech Ancestors (HTA) from Space, did Colonize Earth; they are called the Man Gods and Angels in religion and myth. The 'Original' Pure-bred Colony of Adam and Eve, reproduced by High Tech by our HTA, did 'fall' to Heterosexual Body Birth and the High Tech was lost to them. Divisions of the One Society into many, because of Human Bondage, caused many conflicts and when the Noah/Atlantis Society started regaining High Tech, they mis-used it, and the resulting Unbalanced Elements caused the Planetary Flood. Our divisions and the regaining of High Tech again, has caused the Unbalanced Elements of today, that will cause the Planetary Fire catastrophe. The Noah/Atlantis Society broke the Ice-crystal Canopy around Earth, which caused the Planetary Water Catastrophe, and today we are breaking the Ozone Canopy around Earth, which will cause the Planetary Fire Catastrophe which is forecast in the Bible. These two canopies were set up, by our HTA at the Colonization to protect Life as we know it, from the ultra-violet rays of the Sun. There was no rain on Earth before the Flood, but there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground (Genesis 2:5b, 6). The Earth was on a different Axis before the Planetary Flood; there were no seasons and the one land area had a moderate temperature. There was no rainbow before the Flood. All of this was because of the Axis, and the two Canopies.
The rain lasted for 40 days and nights to float Noah's boat, and then the Deluge began, the windows of Heaven opened, and the fountains of the deep broke open. This all changed the atmosphere of Earth, and now we have a rainbow, which was the promise that Earth would not have another Planetary Flood. It could not happen again, without the frozen water above the atmosphere as it was at Creation/Colonization. The Euphrates River was at a different location before the Flood. In Genesis 2:10,11, a river went out of Eden, and then parted and became four rivers that drained to the sea. One was named Pison, one was Gihon, one was Hiddekel, and one was Euphrates. None of these rivers remain in their original location, and they were probably where the Original land mass broke apart during the Flood. The descriptions of the Ark of Noah has been studied and the results say that the Ark would be as large as the Titanic Ocean Liner. There was an advanced Society before the Flood, and Noah was guided by our HTA to get this boat ready for the Flood. After Noah landed in the Mid-East, they named the local river, the Euphrates. Many biblical scholars have tried to re-locate the Original rivers, and the Garden of Eden, in the Mid-East, but the top strata of Earth has all been changed. The debris on the Top Strata can not be traced back to the Garden of Eden, the original rivers, or any of the land descriptions of the World before the Flood; all changed during the Flood.
Science uses this new Top Strata to trace Evolution back millions of years, and this is not accurate either, as the new Top Strata and megalithic remains of the Noah/Atlantis Society, have only been set up about 4400 years ago during the Flood. The split of our Continents into two, goes along with the Sinking of Atlantis myth, which also split into two. The Arctic and Atlantic Oceans divides our present Continents into two major land masses. There is also a myth of another sunken Continent in the Pacific, called Mu, the Motherland, also called Lemuria. South America replaces Atlantis in the Atlantic Ocean. Maybe Antarctica replaces Mu in the Pacific Ocean. Science and Religion are about the same Physical Life on Earth. The Bible is the Code Book of Life on Earth, from the Creation to the Judgement Day Fire, and we can fit all the rest of the writings in this time period.
"The Flood", 1967. By Alfred M. Rehwinkel, M.A.,B.D.,LL.D. (About Genesis 7:11-24) "There is a majestic awfulness and awe-inspiring solemnity about this picture. There is nothing here of the trivial or the spectacular, nothing to arouse the carnal sympathies for those men and women and children that perished in this fearful destruction. We see nothing of the death struggle; we hear not the cry of despair, we are not called upon to witness the frantic agonies of husband and wife, of parent and child, as they flee in terror before the rising waters, climbing from hilltop and to ever greater heights, only to be pursued even there by a remorseless foe until they all perished. Nor is a word said of the sadness of those who were safe within the ark, looking out upon the destruction that was wrought all about them. The Babylonian tradition of the Flood, which in many respects is similar to the Biblical, differs widely at this point. Tears are shed in heaven over this catastrophe, and even consternation seizes upon the heavenly inhabitants, while within the ark itself the Chaldean Noah is represented as saying: "When the storm came to an end and the terrible water spouts ceased, I opened the window and the light smote upon my face; I looked at the sea, tentatively observing, and the whole humanity had returned to mud. Like seaweed the corpses floated. I was seized with sadness; I sat down and wept, and my tears fell upon my face" -
"That our earth at one time in its history enjoyed a uniformly mild climate in all of its parts is a fact which can be demonstrated, as we have seen, and that a change came suddenly, in fact, very suddenly, and probably at a time of a universal flood, seems to be established beyond a doubt from the frozen mammoths found fully preserved in the flesh in the frozen tundras of northern Siberia. But what caused the change is not definitely known. - Three theories have been suggested. The first is that the earth was tilted 23 1/2 degrees at the time of the Flood, bringing about a change in the relation of the earth to the sun and thus creating the climatic zones as they now exist. If the earth's axis were perpendicular to the plane of its orbit, the sunlight would always extend from pole to pole, and days and nights would always be of equal length, that is twelve hours each, and every portion of the earth's surface in the same latitude would continually receive the same amount of heat and light. In that case there would be no change of season. - According to the second theory the uniform climate of the first world was brought about by the warm ocean waters which surrounded the antediluvian continents. It is believed that the land and water segments were more equally distributed so that no portions of the existing continents were as far removed from the ocean as they are now. It is quite conceivable that a universal ocean of warm water could very well cause a uniformly mild climate in every part of the globe, but that alone could not account for the luxuriant vegetation which flourished during this period in the ancient polar regions, if the antediluvian poles like today were shrouded in darkness for six months of each year. -
"The Third theory attempting to explain the antediluvian climate is the so-called theory. According to this theory the earth was originally surrounded by a canopy of vapor which intercepted the direct rays of the sun. The heat which penetrated the canopy was diffused so equally over all the zones of latitude that the subtropical climate prevailed even in the high latitude. This canopy served to bring about conditions similar to those in a hothouse with a temperature of about 72 degrees. - Storms and rain were unknown in the world of Adam, and hence the rainbow was first seen on the day that Noah left the ark. Extremes of cold and heat were not possible. In the Flood all this changed. The canopy collapsed and was the chief source of the floodwaters. The immediate effect of the removal of the canopy was a radical climatic change. Now the seasons became sharply divided, and there was from now on "a seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter". (Gen 8:22) - Still another most convincing proof from geology for a flood of the magnitude such as described in Genesis is found in the great coal beds found in all parts of the world. Geologists are pretty well agreed that the source of all coal is some form of vegetable matter. Sir William Dawson writes, "Such vegetable matter, once accumulated, requires only pressure and the changes which come of its own slow putrefaction to be converted into coal. But in order that it may accumulate at all, certain conditions are necessary." Dawson postulates three conditions requisite for the formation of coal. The first is a climatic one and other conditions capable of producing a profusion of vegetation sufficient to account for the great coal deposits of the world today. -
"The antediluvian world, with its ideal climate and its luxuriant vegetation, meets all the conditions required here by Dawson. - The second and third conditions required for the formation of coal from vegetable matter, according to Sir William Dawson, are: "The facility for the preservation of the vegetable matter without decay or the intermixture with earth substance and the covering up by other deposits, so as to be compressed and excluded from air." What force of nature could better meet this condition that a flood such as God brought over the first world? Water alone possesses all requirements necessary, first, to uproot the existing vegetation, second, to drift it together in great heaps, and third, to bury it before it rotted. The presence of well-preserved fossil leaves and other delicate parts of plant life seems to prove beyond doubt that the burial must have been very soon after the plant was separated and destroyed. - And what enormous quantities of this coal there have been stored up for the generations of men that were to inhabit the world that followed the Flood! Coal is found on every continent and on many islands of the sea. - There the coal, thus preserved, had been stored many thousands of years. Man either did not know that it was there or did not know what to do with it when he found it. It was not until the eighteenth century, when the steam engine was invented and the Industrial Revolution was ushered in, that coal came into tis own and became a means by which a new world order and a new civilization was created. In 1923 Dr. J.M. MacFarlane, professor of Botany at the University of Pennsylvania, published a notable book - proposes and defends very successfully the theory that fish are the source of all petroleum.
"In this book the author makes out a very strong case for the theory that fish destroyed in prodigious numbers somewhere in the distant past constitute the chief source of our oil deposits. - However, we need not limit ourselves to fishes as the sole source of oil. No doubt all other organisms, containing substances convertible into oil, contributed to the great oil deposits of the present world. As life of every kind, including the myriads of the prehistoric reptiles great and small as well as all other living creatures, was suddenly overtaken, destroyed, and buried, sometimes in great heaps, numbering thousands upon thousands of individuals, the oil contained in these bodies was distilled by heat and pressure and thus stored in sands between impervious strata and there preserved through the ages to the present day. - And, like coal, the existence of oil in certain localities must be regarded as a silent but persistent witness for a world catastrophe such as is recorded in Genesis. Oil is found in fossiliferous strata and is therefore not an original creation, but a product of organic matter. It came into existence not until life had appeared on our planet and after living organisms had been destroyed and buried on a world-wide scale. - various theories have been advanced in explanation, but none of them offers a solution so completely satisfactory as the one which attributes its origin to a great world catastrophe identical with, or at least similar to, the great Flood. -
"The great Flood was, as we have seen, accompanied by great internal disturbances within the earth. The antediluvian seas were filled with an "abundance of living creatures that moved in the water", among them the great whales and leviathans, schools of them, numbering millions and billions; they were killed by volcanic shock and were immediately or soon after buried by great upheavals on the ocean floor, land slides, or falling debris. And there the oil was distilled and stored in the great reservoirs of the earth until man accidently discovered these unlimited reserves of energy and power kept there for him by the omnipotent and benevolent God who preserved while He destroyed. The fossil skeletons of prehistoric reptiles are well known to everyone. - The remains of these ancient monsters have been found on every continent. - Twenty-nine specimens of Iguanodon were found in one coal mine in Belgium 750 feet below the surface. - a sane and reasonable solution of this mystery is to be found in the universal flood catastrophe as described by Moses. Only water could at the same time destroy and bury them on so wide a scale. The account of the Flood in Genesis does not stand alone. Traditions similar to this record are found among nearly all the nations and Tribes of the human race. - If that awful world catastrophe, as described in the Bible, actually happened, the existence of the Flood traditions among the widely separated and primitive people is just what is to be expected. It is only natural that the memory of such an event was rehearsed in the ears of the children of the survivors again and again and possible made the basis of some religious observances.
"The religious ceremonies connected with these traditions, as found in Egypt, Mexico and among some tribes of the American Indians, can be satisfactorily explained only in this light. This awful disaster left an indelible impression upon the minds of men before they were scattered abroad; and whether we go to ancient Babylon, to the Sumerians or to the Chaldeans, to the Chinese or the American Indians, to the natives of the Pacific Islands or to the ancient inhabitants of India, everywhere is found some trace of a Flood tradition and a memory of a fearful catastrophe which destroyed mankind and left but one or a few survivors. - These traditions have been collected and studies, but the men who collected them were not necessarily interested in establishing the truth of the Biblical account of the Flood. - Even after sin and death had come into the world before the Flood, it was still a world vastly superior to the world which is now. - The ancients had a legend concerning a vanished continent in the Atlantic Ocean. It was the dwelling place of the gods and a great race of people, but was suddenly and mysteriously swallowed up by the ocean as a result of an earthquake. It is not mere speculation to speak of the first world as a "veritable paradise". For though there are but meager written records concerning this first world, there is another kind of record which God has preserved for us in His wisdom. This record is reliable and true and is written in large and legible letters in the very foundation rocks of our present world. The record I refer to are the fossil remains that have been found in great abundance in every part of the globe.
"These fossils do not lie. Just as the pyramids of Egypt and the monuments of Greece and Rome are an evidence of the greatness of the civilization that produced them, so these fossils speak of an eloquent language of the glories of a world which has passed away. These fossils have been preserved for a purpose. - The fossils show there was a perfectly uniform, non-zonal, mild, and springlike climate in every part of the globe. - An irrefutable proof for the unparalleled luxuriance of plant life in that prehistoric world are the great coal beds found in every continent of the earth today. - If God spared not this magnificent world of His original creation, how will the ungodly and the wicked of today escape His wrath when the Day of Judgment shall dawn upon this second world. Three theories have been suggested as to climate alterations. The first is that the earth was tilted 23 1/2 degrees at the time of the Flood, bringing about a change in the relation of the earth to the sun and thus creating the climatic zones as they now exist. If the earth's axis were perpendicular to the plane of its orbit, the sunlight would always extend from pole to pole, and days and nights would always be of equal length, that is twelve hours each, and every portion of the earth's surface in the same latitude would continually receive the same amount of heat and light. In that case there would be no change of season. - The tilted position of the earth therefore accounts for the arctic and antarctic regions of the two poles and for the seasons of the year. - According to a second theory the uniform climate of the first world was brought about by the warm ocean waters which surrounded the antediluvian continents.
"It is believed that the land and water segments were more equally distributed so that no potions of the existing continents were as far removed from the ocean as they are now. It is quite conceivable that a universal ocean of warm water could very well cause a uniformly mild climate in every part of the vegetation which flourished during this period in the ancient polar regions, if the antediluvian poles like today were shrouded in darkness for six months of each year. Another version of this same theory holds that warm ocean currents were so distributed that every portion of the existing land masses was touched and warmed by them, similar to the conditions of those parts of the world today that are affected by the Gulf Stream and the Japan Current. Everyone is familiar with this strange phenomenon of ocean currents, that is, those remarkable rivers of warm water flowing in a sea of cold water and keeping a definite and permanent course for thousands of miles. The Gulf Stream, which derives its name from the Gulf of Mexico, where it seems to originate, is the best known and the most remarkable of these ocean currents. It is a stream much larger than either the Mississippi or the Amazon. It is fifty miles wide at the Straits of Florida and has an average depth of about 1500 feet. This stream is more than 4000 miles long, its rate of flow varying from about three to five miles an hour. The temperature of its water is warmer than the ocean at the Equator, but cools slightly as it travels northward. This Gulf Stream, with the prevailing westerly winds, is responsible for the mild climate of England and northwestern Europe and affects the climate even as far north as Spitzbergen.
"In southern England, which lies in about the same latitude as Edmonton, Alberta, the winters are very mind, with very little ice and snow, so that vegetables like cabbage can be left in the gardens all winter, while the mercury in Edmonton at the same time might dip to fifty and occasionally even to sixty degrees below zero. The Japan Current has the same influence on the climate of Alaska and British Colombia. If similar currents touched all of the antediluvian continents and affected them as the Gulf Stream affects northwestern Europe and the Japan Current Alaska and British Columbia today, then it is quite conceivable that this might well account for a uniformly mild climate throughout the ancient world. But this, too, would not offer a satisfactory explanation for the rich vegetation in the polar regions. The third theory attempting to explain the antediluvian climate is the so-called canopy theory. According to this theory the earth was originally surrounded by a canopy of vapor which intercepted the direct rays of the sun. The heat which penetrated the canopy was diffused so equally over all the zones of latitude that the subtropical climate prevailed even in the high latitude. This canopy served to bring about conditions similar to those in a hothouse with a temperature of about 72 degrees F. The chemical rays of the sun, especially those most active in the aging of living things and those that bring about decay and fermentation, were intercepted by the canopy, and as a result, men and animals lived to great ages. Storms and rain were unknown in the world of Adam, and hence the rainbow was first seen on the day that Noah left the ark. Extremes of cold and heat were not possible.
"In the Flood all this changed. The canopy collapsed and was the chief source of the floodwaters. The immediate effect of the removal of the canopy was a radical climatic change. Now the seasons became sharply divided, and there was from now on "a seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter" (Gen. 8:22). These are the three theories that have been proposed to offer a possible solution for the wonderful climatic conditions that prevailed in the world before the Flood. It is impossible, or course, to know which, if any, of these theories correctly describes the conditions. The most reasonable view would seem to be to assume that all three, or at least the first two, might have applied, that is, to assume that the earth was tilted at the time of the Flood out of its original position, thus changing the relation of the earth to the sun and creating the two polar regions, and that the temperature of the first world had been equalized by the warm ocean water or warm ocean currents. But something might even be said in favor of the canopy theory. At any rate Gen. 2:5 and Gen. 9:13 become more meaningful within the framework of this theory. With such favorable climatic conditions prevailing everywhere, it requires no great flights of the imagination to perceive that the flora and the fauna of that world would be in harmony with their physical surroundings, and therefore far superior to the flora and fauna of the world today. And so it was, for this too, is borne out by the records in the rocks."
K.C. TIMES, 3/15/19'73'. "Pyramid Twist Suggests New North" By Walter Sullivan. "Highly accurate surveys of the Great Pyramid of Cheops at Giza have shown that the ancient Egyptians built it with extraordinary precision. But, while its sides are oriented almost exactly north, south, east, and west, the entire structure is twisted slightly to the west. This has led to a theory in the current issue of the journal, 'Science' that north, as observed from Giza when the pyramid was built 45 centuries ago, was not the same as today. Either, it is suggested, the spin axis of the earth has changed sufficiently to account for the error by displacement of the North Pole, or Africa has rotated as a consequence of continental drift. G.S. Pawley and N. Abrahamsen argue that, while the pyramid is twisted only about four minutes of are from exact north, the deviation is too great to be accidental. At the time the pyramid was built, because of the precession of the equinoxes, Bega was the North Star, some 30 degrees above the horizon and thus ideally situated for sighting by surveyors. - They point out that while the spin axis of the earth is subject to a very slow shift, it is not enough to account for the error.
"Likewise the new theory of slow movements by plates of the earth's crust in which the continents are embedded does not seem adequate. According to this theory the North Atlantic is spreading from its central ridge, pushing Europe and North America apart, and Africa, is a counter movement, is swinging away from the Arabian Peninsula and into the South Atlantic. Perhaps, say the two scientists, other ancient structures oriented towards celestial targets can be used to explore the possibility that the spin axis of the world, or its geography, have changed in ways as yet unsuspected. The two scientists point out that the first person to conduct a careful survey of the pyramids, Flinders Petrie, noted the misalignment in 1940 and concluded that the pole had moved. But, they add, "his observation seems to have been overlooked by scientists outside archaeology"."
"The Lost Continent of Mu", 19'31'. By James Churchward. "The Garden of Eden was not in Asia but on a now sunken continent in the Pacific Ocean. These assertions can be proved by the complex records I discovered upon long-forgotten sacred tablets in India, together with records from other countries. They tell of this strange country of 64,000,000 inhabitants, who 50,000 years ago, had developed a civilization superior in many respects to our own. They described, among other things the creation of man in the mysterious land of Mu. - The Old records describe the destruction of Mu, when the earth's crust was broken up by earthquakes and sank into a fiery abyss. Waters of the Pacific rolled in over her, leaving only water where once was a mighty civilization. - Steel-headed man, leader of all men and much beloved by the Thunder Bird, who lifted his god mask and revealed a human face to steel-headed man. - Extract from Llasa Record: All shall die (people then) and from your ashes new nations shall arise. If they forget they are superior, not because of what they put on but what they put out, the same will befall them. - Mystic forces, blind see through their skin and walk through fire. - Osiris lived in Atlantis and was a great religious teacher, a master."
"Astrology: The Space Age Science" By Joseph F. Goodavage. - "The most ancient periods in Egypt's history were more advanced than the later dynasties, a fact suggesting that all Egyptian culture was implanted by something even greater - a more ancient, more advanced civilization. The historical geological, and mythological evidence further suggests that this great civilization went down in a terrible convulsion of nature. - "Science" says Ignatius Donnelly in 'Atlantis: The Antediluvian World', "has but commenced its work of reconstructing the past and rehabilitating the ancient peoples, and surely there is no study which appeals more strongly to the imagination than that of this drowned nation, the true antediluvians. - These lost people were our ancestors, their blood flows in our veins; . Every line of race and thought, of blood and belief, leads back to them." If true, this idea will eventually be proven - and will revolutionize our entire concept of human history."
"Smithsonian Magazine", (1986,87,88?) "Has the Garden of Eden been located at last?" By Dora Jane Hamblin. (The author, a frequent contributor, met Dr. Zarins and his Eden theory when writing of Saudi archaeology (September 1983) and has followed his work since.) "Theologians, historians, ordinary inquisitive people and men of science have tried for centuries to figure it out. Eden has been "located" in as many diverse areas as has lost Atlantis. Some early Christian fathers and late classical authors suggested it could lie in Mongolia or India or Ethiopia. They based their theories quite sensibly on the known antiquity of those regions, and on the notion that the mysterious Pison and Gihon were to be associated with those other two great rivers of the ancient world, the Nile and the Ganges. Another favorite locale for the Garden had been Turkey, because both the Tigris and the Euphrates rise in the mountains there, and because Mount Ararat, where Noah's Ark came to rest, is there. In the past hundred years, since the discovery of ancient civilization in modern Iraq, scholars have leaned toward the Tigris-Euphrates valley in general, and to the sites of southern Sumer, about 150 miles north of the present head of the Persian Gulf, in particular. To this southern Sumerian theory Dr. Juris Zarins, of Southwest Missouri State University in Springfield, would murmur: "You're getting warmer".
"For Dr. Zarins, who has spent seven years working out his own hypothesis, believes that the Garden of Eden lies presently under the waters of the Persian Gulf, and he further believes that the story of Adam and Eve in - and especially 'out' - of the Garden is a highly condensed and evocative account of perhaps the greatest revolution that ever shook mankind: the shift from hunting-gathering to agriculture. - It is a tale of rich complexity, beginning 30 millennia before the birth of Christ. Of climatic shifts from moist to arid to moist, with consequent migrations eddying back and forth across, and up and down the Middle East. - There are two crucial if approximate dates in reconstruction. The first is about 30,000 B.C., with the transition from Neanderthal to modern Man. This, some anthropologists believe, took place along the eastern shore of the Mediterranean and Aegean seas and in Iraq. At that time the Great Ice Age still held most of Eurasia in its grip, and it caused the sea levels to fall by 400 feet so that what is now the Persian Gulf was dry land, all the way to the Strait of Hormuz. It was irrigated not only by the still-existing Tigris and Euphrates but also by the Gihon, the Pison and their tributaries from the Arabian peninsula and from Iran. It seems reasonable that technologically primitive but modern Man, in his endless search for food, would have located the considerable natural paradise that presented itself in the area where the Gulf now lies. But Eden wasn't born then. That come, Zarins believes, about 6000 B.C. in between 30,000 and 6000 B.C., the climate varied. From 15,000 B.C., rainfall diminished drastically.
"Faced with increasing aridity, the Paleolithic population retreated, some as far as the area known to us as the "Fertile Crescent" (north along the Tigris and Euphrates, westward toward the moist Mediterranean coast, south to the Nile), and also eastward to the Indus River valley. - Then, at about 6000 to 5000 B.C., following a long arid stretch, came a period called the Neolithic Wet Phase when rains returned to the Gulf region. - And so about 6000 to 500 B.C. the land was again a paradise on Earth, provided by a bountiful nature - God - and admirably suited to the foraging life. This time, however, there was a difference: agriculture had been invented. - It was in Saudi Arabia that Zarins encountered the Ubalidians, and there that he began developing his hypothesis about the true meaning of the Biblical Eden. One clue lies in linguistics: the term Eden, or Edin, appears first in Sumer, the Mesopotamian region that produced the world's first written language. - In Sumerian the word "Eden" meant simply "fertile plain". The word "Adam" also existed in cuneiform, meaning something like "settlement on the plain". Although both words were set down first in Sumerian, along with place names like Ur and Uruk, they are not Sumerian in origin. They are older. - However it was, the existing names were incorporated into Sumerian and written down for the first time. And the mythology of a lush and lovely spot called Eden was codified by being written. -
"The whole Garden of Eden story, however, when finally written, could be seen to represent the point of view of the hunter-gatherers", Zarins reasons. "It was the result of tension between the two groups, the collision of two ways of life. Adam and Eve were heirs to natural bounty. They had everything they needed. But they sinned and were expelled. How did they sin? By challenging God's very omnipotence. In so doing they represented the agriculturalists, the upstarts who insisted on taking matters into their own hands, relying upon their knowledge and their own skills rather than on His bounty. - "It became a part of collective memory and at long last it was written down, highly condensed, in 'Genesis'. - How did it happen that an advanced people would perpetuate a myth making their own ancestors the sinners? It may be that the Ubidians, who are known to have sailed down the east coast of Arabia and colonized there, ran into descendants of foragers displaced from a drowning Eden, from them heard the awful story of the loss of paradise and repeated it until it became their own legend. Or it may be that, responding to the increasing pressures and stresses of a society growing in complexity, they found comfort in a fantasy of the good old days, when life had been sweeter, simpler, more idyllic. However, it was a tale firmly established in Ubidian mythology, then adopted and recorded by the Sumerians."
The hunters and gatherers started after the Original Colony 'fell' to Heterosexual Body Birth. Adam and Eve were reproduced in a High Tech Womb, the Higher Nature of Reproduction; Cain and Abel were reproduced by Body Birth, the Lower Nature. Cain raised sheep and Abel raised vegetables. The Society after the Flood, again had to start over, being hunters and gatherers. Atlantis, and the Noah Society, were the 'same' High Tech civilization before the Flood. Atlantis was the High Tech Society like America. There was a large population explosion before the Flood Judgement like we are experiencing today before the Fire Judgement. It was not a backward Society that was destroyed. They had a knowledge explosion 100 years before the Flood; it was an Unbalanced High Tech Society. They destroyed the Ice-crystal Canopy, with their Unbalanced High Tech Elements, just as we are destroying the Ozone Canopy with our Unbalanced High Tech Elements, from a knowledge explosion which we have had for 100 years. History is repeating itself. Our Science today, knows the steps on how to Colonize a Planet, and they will have to follow Creation steps in Genesis, that our HTA, used to Colonize Earth. They are real people, not supernatural Gods, Angels, or Spirit Beings, but do have Eternal Physical Life and Balanced Elements in their Society.
In Genesis 6, Noah was told by God/HTA to build an Ark that was as large as the Titanic Ocean Liner. We do not have a record in the Bible of how the Lord/HTA helped Noah build the Ark. We 'do' have a detailed account of how the Lord/HTA helped Moses and the Children of Israel construct the Tabernacle and the Ark of the Covenant, in the Wilderness. There may be writings that have not yet been translated, that tell about the construction of Noah's Ark. The measurements and material used, are listed, but not how it was accomplished. There is no way Noah could have built it by himself, as it was as large as the Titanic Ocean Liner, and they had an UnBalanced High Tech as we have today. The Noah Flood has been mis-taught for years, using only 2 pair of animals, birds, etc., and saying it was only a 40 day Flood. Noah was instructed to put 7 pair of clean animals, birds, etc., in the Ark, and 2 pair of unclean animals, etc., in it, in Genesis 7:1-3. Noah and his so-called sons and their wives could have been the different colors of humans, that Noah took in the Ark, as he took the 7 pairs of clean animals, birds, etc. What skin color was the Adam and Eve Colony? Where did the different skin colors come from, if not in the egg and sperm genetics, of the humans like Adam and Eve, that were created by High Tech Birth, before the Fall to Body Birth. Maybe they controlled the type of Human that they made. There are no parents recorded for Adam and Eve, and their supernatural birth was by High Tech. Most people seem to know about different strains of flowers and pure-bred animals, but draw the line at Breeding pure-bred Humans, like the ones that started Life on Earth, called "Higher Beings".
We are descendent from the Asexual Adam and Eve Colony, that were not born by body birth, but were as human as we are; we are their descendants. We are up to the technology where this can be understood. There were others in that first Colony also born on Day 6, and maybe they had the skin colors we have today. Although if the first colony had the different skin colors they were All of Equal High Tech Birth, and there was no Heterosexual misbreeding, to cause imperfect genetic strains, and all were Equal. There is no marring or giving in marriage in the Kingdom of Heaven/HTA Planet. We will probably find out about skin colors, when our HTA and Jesus return for the Millennium. Jesus is Alive in a physical body, and is with our HTA in Space. You do not die and go to Heaven to be with Jesus, you go 'up there' by High Tech, as the people saved on Judgement Day will go Alive with God/HTA and Jesus, by High Tech in the Space City, the New Jerusalem, which descends down out of Heaven.
"The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia" By Dr. Cecil Roth and Dr. Geoffrey Wigoder. "Flood" "Deluge brought by God to destroy mankind because of its wickedness (Gen. 6-9). The central figure in the narrative is Noah who, as the one righteous man on earth, is bidden to make an ark in which to shelter his family and male and female specimens of all living creatures, so that mankind may begin afresh after the catastrophe. The flood lasted for 150 days and the ark eventually came to rest on Mt. Ararat. This story is closely paralleled in the eleventh tablet of the Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic, the phenomenon being native to Babylonia, although it should be noted that the biblical flood was due to rain and not inundation. The historical background of the tradition of the flood was thought to have been demonstrated by Sir Leonard Wooley in his excavations at Ur (1927-9) and other places but the evidence of floods discovered are now known to have been entirely local. The flood legend is common among many peoples."
Thinking the Noah Flood was a local Flood is still current. If it was local how did Noah's boat get up on Mt. Ararat? Supernaturally? The flood lasted over a year before Noah left the Ark. All this is in the Bible, but when you are told a Bible story as a child, I guess when you read it in the Bible, you only absorb the parts you are taught. I was taught and always thought it was a local flood, in the small civilization of Noah's time. How different it was, when I was led to understand it as a Planetary Flood, and the same event as the sinking of Atlantis. Noah and his 'family' re-started Life on Earth in the Mid-East, from which our current written history begins. We did not begin evolving in the Mid-East, or in Africa, or in China. We do not know the location of the Garden of Eden, the High Tech Lab of our HTA, as all this was restricted to the Fallen Society, and was withdrawn by our HTA.
K.C. TIMES, 19'73'. "Noah Kept Human Family on Track" "Aside from Adam, the patriarch Noah can be regarded as father of the world. And what a man he was! Noah died at the fine age of 950, some 350 years after his great voyage. Did you know that Noah had warning of the flood 120 years before it happened? Noah's three sons, Ham, Shem and Japheth, re-started the human race - and may have had a profound effect on various races - depending on your Biblical interpretation or belief. But Noah had his weaknesses and sin in the eyes of God. Anyway, if you believe the Scriptures he was a father to us all."
K.C. STAR, 12/6/19'81'. "Humor, action reign in tale of biblical flood" By Joanne Christensen. A book review of "Surviving the Flood", By Stephen Minot. "Will Methuselah give Ham the answers? Will Ham wed Sapphira, the servant girl? Will Sapphira ever be free of Shem? Is this a soap opera? No, just a few of the questions raised by Stephen Minot in "Surviving the Flood", a lively account of that cruise for survival aboard the ark that Noah built. The story is told by Noah's son, Ham, in his 900th year, when the voyage is a matter of memory. It's his turn to set things straight; he disagrees with the Official Record, and after all, he was there. He cannot understand why the historians have left Methuselah and the servants off the passenger list. They also have left out all discussion of those left behind. "How is it that in one line, the Deluge lasted by 40 days - long enough, I can assure you - but in others, it is 150 days?" Ham asks. "A third verse raises it to seven months. No slight slip of the quill there. And how is it that the waters are described as a mere 15 cubits deep - the height of four men - and that this, they say, was enough to cover the mountains? The same report describes our barge as 30 cubits high. With such measurements, we would never have been afloat. "No, that report will never do. Not for careful readers. This is not to underestimate the effort.
"All those commissions and review boards. They had their share of literary minds well trained in the demands of narrative forms - the balance of scenes, consistency of character, the logical sequence of events, plausibility for its own sake. Lord knows they did their best". So Ham tells it true. Mr. Minot has fleshed out one of the best-known stories and gives it new dimensions. Under his hand, the well-known characters have depth and diversity. There's also a great deal of action among the cast - more than most would suspect from the sparse biblical account. The author is to be congratulated on his imagination and the humor with which he tells his story. It's a good read - on any but a rainy day."
We need to quit blaming 'God' for Man's problems, for the Flood or for Sin. Asexual Man was put in charge and was to be responsible for the Caretaking of Balanced Life Elements and the Equality of All. Why, they used Body Breeding, I do not know, but they may have used it for a temporary plan until our HTA returned again. It was not accepted when our HTA returned. Fallen Man caused the Flood, with their Unbalanced Elements. Going to war, killing our Brothers/Sisters of Life, and not taking care of our Planet results in Catastrophes. We are setting up the Judgement Day Fire Catastrophe with our Unbalanced Elements today, that will break the Ozone Canopy and burn off the green element needed for our type of Life. Nothing is more important for Atom Life, than Balanced Elements. Christ is Balanced Elements and Physical Life. Anti-Christ is Unbalanced Elements and Death. Whom should we Serve? Eternal Physical Life or Physical Death?