Our High Tech Ancestors (HTA) from Space, Colonized Earth, and the 6 Days of Genesis, covered the time of 10,000 BC - 5,000 BC. Our HTA are the Higher 'Beings', Man Gods and Angels of religion and myth, and were seen and talked to by many, face to face. They reproduced the Original Pure-bred Colony of Adam and Eve, in a High Tech Womb in the Garden of Eden. On Day 7, 4,000 BC, the Asexual Colony was put in charge and 'fell' to Heterosexual Body Birth, the Original Sin, and had to go through the cycles of birth, death, and rebirth. The Noah Atlantis Society, had a population explosion, regained an Unbalanced High Tech, like we have today, and their Unbalanced High Tech caused the Noah/Atlantis Planetary Flood. After a year, Noah landed in the Mid-East in about 2400 BC, and our Present History began. Life on Earth did not evolve for millions of years. It is only in our more recent History that the Evolution theory has been accepted. Man was so busy repopulating the Earth, that investigating the debris left on our Top Strata from the Flood. High Tech is 'super'natural, and our HTA use it for Eternal Physical Life, and, for Colonizing Planets. We need a High Tech translation of religion and myth about our Past, to 'know' Earth 'was' Colonized by our HTA, and we are still 'in their image', even with our genetic defects.
Our Science projects that the first step to colonize a Planet with a soupy atmosphere, like Earth had 'in the beginning', is to send a blue-green algae bomb into the mix, to separate the gases and water elements. In Genesis, the Spirit of God moved over the waters, which was the inserting of the blue-green algae into the soupy atmosphere by our HTA. This set up the different layers of atmosphere to make the Oxygen necessary for our type of Life, mistranslated the heaven or heavens, in Genesis. The atmosphere was translated the firmament. Some of the gasses made the Ozone Canopy around Earth. Then the water elements separated, and the water above the firmament made the Ice-Crystal Canopy around Earth, and the water below the firmament made the seas, around the original land mass that was in one place. The Ozone and Ice-Crystal Canopy gave protection from the ultraviolet rays of the Sun, for the Life that was added later.
The Gospel Truth. Genesis 1:1,2. King James Version. "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth and the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters". -
Genesis 1:1,2. The Living Bible. "When God began creating the heavens and the earth, the earth was at first a shapeless, chaotic mass, with the Spirit of God brooding over the dark vapors". -
Genesis 1:1,2. New World Translation. "In [the] beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth proved to be formless and waste and there was darkness upon the surface of [the] watery deep; and God's active force was moving to and fro over the surface of the waters."
On Day 1,2, the blue-green algae was sent into Earths soupy atmosphere to set up the Oxygen and Water elements for the atmosphere necessary for Life. On Day 3, the grass, herbs, fruit trees, etc., were added to help clean up the soupy atmosphere. On Day 4, the atmosphere was clear and the sun, moon, and stars could be seen from land. Day 4 was not the creation of the sun, moon, and stars, which is our Universe; a Planet could not be in existence before its Sun/Star. This misunderstanding helped Man to think the Earth was the center of the creation. Galileo proved the Earth was not the center of the Solar System. On Day 5, the fish, fowl, etc. was added. On Day 6, the cattle, beasts, etc., and Man were added. The Original Purebred Colony of Adam and Eve were reproduced by the High Tech Womb, the Asexual Higher Nature of reproduction; the Garden of Eden was our HTAs High Tech Lab location. The new Colony had genetic purity, had One Society that Shared All Things Equally, as Jesus taught during his time on Earth. The Original Colony were helpmeets, not mates, and they were to be the Caretaker Species of Earth.
Body Birth started the genetic mis-breeding, birth defects, and dysfunctional people, and Cain the first person recorded born by Body Birth killed his Brother; Killing and Death started and has continued until Today. I have not found any explanation as yet for why they started Body Birth. Cain went out and established another city/nation, and from then on the One Society has divided many times. Human Bondage also sets up disease, lust, coveting, hate, greed, materialism, sickness, pollution, war and death. Body Birth started the inferior bodies we have to live in, the Killing of our Brothers/Sisters of Life, the genetic misbreeding and Body Birth damage, and all the dysfunctional Lifestyles of today; the wages of 'sin'/Body Birth, is death. The misuse of the Noah/Atlantis High Tech made Unbalanced Elements, Pollution, and Weapons of massive destruction, which caused a Planetary Flood Catastrophe, which lasted over a year. The rain lasted 40 days and nights. Then the fountains of the deep broke open and the windows of heaven opened. After the 40 days of rain, to float Noah's boat, the source of the three waters: the rain, the collapse of the Ice-crystal Canopy, and the fountains of the deep which broke open, continued for 5 months more. When the Flood waters subsided and Noah debarked, it was over a year that he was in the Ark. All of this is in Genesis but is not understood. Many think the Noah Flood lasted 40 days and was a local flood, not worldwide.
The Noah/Atlantis Society's Unbalanced High Tech Elements, or their High Tech weapons, broke the Ice-Crystal Canopy, which fell and broke the one land mass into our Continents, changed the axis, and set down the ice at our poles. The Tidal Wave action of the Planetary Flood set down the Top Strata that Science uses to estimate the millions of years of Evolution. Science nor Religion can trace back our Top Strata to the Garden of Eden, let alone for millions of years. Our Planet's original mass was here since our Sun's Solar System, but Life was Colonized on Earth, and the Flood Catastrophe changed the Top Strata. As we re-look at old manuscripts, we may find out where Eden was in the World before the Flood, by using my understanding of the Continent joining. With the Continent joining shown to me, rejoining North America to Asia at the top of the globe, and moving South America up to replace the Atlantic Ocean, this land mass joins to Europe, and we have the Original One Land Mass at Colonization. The original one land mass that Science projects is joined together differently. Once Science joins the Continents as I described, it may show where the description of the Original Rivers were, listed in Genesis, and we may find where Eden was located. Science projects that the Continents drifted apart, instead of breaking apart and sinking.
Religion can not trace the Mid-East re-population of Society back to Eden, because the Earth was broke apart into Continents, and because Noah landed in the Mid-East, it does not mean that is where he originated from, on the Planet before the Flood. All the Top Strata on Earth at present was laid down during the Flood; the High Tech megalithic remains are from the Noah/Atlantis World Before the Flood. Science numbers the years of fossils found in the soil by the age of the rocks, etc. The rocks are part of the Original Mass that was here since the Solar System was formed, and they have a different age than the debris left after the Planetary Water Death of Earth. The debris can not be classified as the same age as the original rock base. Many lime and marble deposits are from the bones of the Life before the Flood. The coal and oil were also deposited from the flora, fauna, and Man, and the different species that died in the flood, and with the Tidal Wave Action worldwide, the different layers were made. Atlantis broke down the middle and sank. Our Continents show this break of the two main sections now divided by the Arctic and Atlantic Oceans, and all the land mass was under water also. On a Global map, South America hangs down from where it should be, and probably took the brunt of the fall of the Ice-Crystal Canopy, or the Noah/Atlantis Society had a weapons depot there that blew up.
Today, we are again setting up a Planetary Catastrophe with our Unbalanced Elements that is breaking the Ozone Canopy, and along with our Nuclear waste and Pollution we have set up the Judgement Day Fire Catastrophe with all the oil spills on land and sea. We also have had a population explosion for the past 100 years. In 1900 we had 1 billion people, and today, in 1999 we have 6 billion genetically dysfunction people, that have made enough nuclear bombs to blow up many Planets like Earth. The High Tech Species of Man was to be the Caretaker of Life, but in the Lower Nature of reproduction made the genetic changes and they became the Killer Species. Until Man controls the seed of the male, we cannot change our Killer genetics, which have been mixed over and over for 6000 years. Until High Tech corrections can be set up for the 6 billion people. We need to stop the seed of the male and put our resources into making a High Tech Womb, to make genetic Pure-bred people again. The One True God of the Hydrogen Atom Universes, is the Source Of Life (SOL), is the One God of religion that no one has ever seen, and is the source of the Big Bang. Religion and Science are about the same Atom Life. The SOL joins together the seed of Man in a High Tech Womb or in the female womb. It is up to Man what type people they make, Pure-bred or Dysfunctional. Whatsoever Man sows that also shall they reap.
"Genesis and Science" 1967, by Harold W. Clark. "Preface" - "This is the day of Science. Man has probed the secrets of nature from the inside of the atom beyond the microscope to the galaxies beyond the telescope. He has learned to travel at fantastic speeds on land, in the air, and in outer space. Things never dreamed of a generation ago are now common. - The author, a professor of science for about a half a century, has chosen to keep the level of the vocabulary simple. It is within the comprehension of anyone from the upper grades onward. - It is intended for any, old or young, who may find the relation between science and the Bible perplexing." -
"If the Flood was of such a violent nature, why wouldn't all types of life have been mixed together in one grand confusion? But if we read the Genesis record carefully, we learn that it was 150 days - five months - before the waters reached the tops of the highest mountains. Even though wave action may have been violent - and there is abundant evidence that it was - the water rose higher gradually upon the land, sweeping away zone after zone, habitat, burying their plants and animals in mud and sand, thus producing the fossil zones corresponding roughly to earth's original zones. - We must guard against the conclusion that the fossil zones now exist in exactly the same location as the original one, or that they are a perfect replica of them. Because of the violent wave action many of the specimens would be carried for long distances before coming to rest. There would be some mixing. The very fact that there is any order or sequence at all indicates that there must have been some definite arrangement in the original world. - When both the Bible and science are correctly understood, there can be no conflict between them, for both have the same author. Bit if either one is misinterpreted, difficulties will arise, and we will fall short of a true understanding of their relationship. - It is time for Christians to study the Genesis record." (Bone fragments found in Africa.) "It is interesting to note that these ancient people were closely related structurally to the living aborigines of Australia. In fact, certain evidence seems to indicate that the aborigines of Australia and the natives of New Guinea are probably descendants of these ancient peoples. But this does not mean that any of them, ancient or modern, have descended from apes or apelike ancestors.
"In fact, certain evidence seems to indicate that the aborigines of Australia and the natives of New Guinea are probably descendants of these ancient peoples. But this does not mean that any of them, ancient or modern, have descended from apes or apelike ancestors. - A critical study of the Australoid skulls fails to give evidence of apelike origin. - As we consider the origin of civilization, let us go to the plains of Mesopotamia and see whether there is any indication of an evolutionary development through the various stone ages. The fact is remarkable that when the archaeologists dug into the remains of the ancient cities, they found at the very bottom layers indications of a high degree of civilization. Gold and copper implements and ornaments, ivory inlaid work, and other beautiful art objects were discovered. The bottom layers did not indicate any lower degree of culture than the top layers. When all the evidence from excavations and from existing jungle villages is carefully considered, it indicates clearly that inasmuch as the very earliest known cities possessed a high degree of culture, the present crude villages of the savage people are quite evidently the result of degeneracy rather than upward progress. - Archaeologists tell us that high and low types of humanity lived together in ancient times. In some places in Palestine people resembling the Neanderthal race lived in caves, while the people of Jericho and other cities lived in well-built, beautifully decorated houses. Men lived in caves on the shores of the Red Sea around the year 60 B.C. Their presence is no proof that they originated by an evolutionary process. -
"Generally geologists say that the oceans of the past were not like those of the present. In order to allow for the bedded sediments, they assume that the oceans were shallow and the streams entering them more violent than they are today. But these assumptions look somewhat like theories invented to fit the facts. The diluvialist (one who believes in the Flood) can just as easily explain these conditions in terms of natural catastrophe. It is doubtless just as scientific to accept the Flood theory of geology as to explain everything by normal action through long ages, especially when so many facts clearly indicate violence rather than normal action. - Geologists have pictured this ancient forest as a vast swamp, but the swamp, or bog, theory of coal formation has many difficulties. For one, there is not a single bog or swamp in existence which could supply enough peat to make large coal seams. In some coal beds trees have been found extending up through several layers of coal. This would be impossible unless the material was buried suddenly. Dana, one of the most illustrious geologists of the nineteenth century, says in his 'manual' that, while the Carboniferous Period is estimated to have lasted for about six million years, during all that time there was practically no change in species of plants. Whenever in our day a land area has its vegetation destroyed by fire or flood, the next forest to develop is quite different from that formerly occupying the area. Yet in the Coal Period, which was supposed to have lasted millions of years and to have been submerged over and over again, the vegetation remained the same. It was practically identical over the world, and evolutionary assumptions do not seem to be very consistent with the facts.
"Picture these immense forests being swept away suddenly by terrific torrents of water, then buried by mud and sand, and then another rush of water bringing more plant material. This action, continued over and over again, would lay down the sediments which would very quickly become coal beds. I have examined the coal beds at Joggins, Nova Scotia, where they are exposed on the cliffs along the shore of the Bay of Fundy. From miles away tilted layers of sand and shale, alternating with coal seams, can be clearly seen. It was very hard to imagine any of these layers as soil in which forests could grow. They all seemed to represent a succession of mud and sand beds washed into place. - In most of these mountain regions, as the uplift occurred, great folds were produced. - Perhaps no other phenomenon gives such proof of the sudden catastrophic nature of the great earth movements which have acted on its crust in the past. When such action is duplicated in several places on a greater or lesser scale, we can begin to realize the magnitude of the forces which raised the mountains and wrenched the earth's crust with such terrific force that they nearly tore it apart. The Flood must have reached its climax in a stupendous display of violence. Surely the case for catastrophism becomes increasingly clear as these worldwide movements are studied. One outstanding writer has called it "the breaking up of the terrestrial globe". Geography was going through such a radical alteration that it could never again bear any resemblance to the original. Lands which were created in the beginning disappeared beneath the rising tides, while new continents were destined to appear from beneath the waste of water. -
"If we find that our scientific theories conflict with the Bible record, we must ask ourselves which we shall accept, human theories or the plain statements of God's Word. - One of the most striking of all legends is that of the Chinese. On a Buddhist temple in China a traveler reported seeing a beautiful scene sculptured in stucco. A goddess of mercy was looking down from heaven on a lonely Noah in his ark amid the raging waters of the Deluge. A dove with an olive branch in its beak was flying toward the vessel. The Chinese legend describes a period of wealth and happiness, after which men grew very wicked and the earth was destroyed. The stars were moved, apparently by the rocking of the earth. Summarizing all the evidence regarding ancient man, we can readily see that the idea of Man's evolution from any ape-like creature is without adequate foundation. There is no reason for a Christian to surrender belief in the Scriptural record, which says that man was created in the image of God. - The Bible record of the Flood has a sound scientific foundation, and the geological phenomena, when correctly understood, are powerful witnesses to the truthfulness of the Bible story."
The stars seemed to be moved because the Earth's Axis was changed during the Flood, so the stars would have a different perspective from the land areas of today.
"Signs of the Times" Magazine, April, 1972. "Hell and High Water" By George E. Vandeman. "An ancient Book says that water once covered this planet and wiped out a race. The same Book tells of global fire - in the future. Were the waters that covered the first world only fiction? Are the threatened fires of doomsday only a fantasy of fear? Is there some strange tie between hell and high water? Someone has suggested that if we had no record of a global flood we should need to invent one. For to take a good look at the surface of this planet is to unlock a fascinating, surprising story written in the rocks. And it is the story of water. Mysterious water lines on mountain peaks. Great inland basins once filled with water. Disappearing lakes. Sea life high in mountain crags. Fossils in unexpected places, - with an unexpected story. All these are a parade of witnesses that something has happened. Everywhere it is a story of water, of destruction and upheavel on a scale never equaled. And before that - a fabulous world beyond our power even to imagine, much less describe. A world with a perfect climate from pole to pole. A world with vegetation more luxuriant than we have ever observed - everywhere. A world inhabited by animals of fantastic size and numbers. - But evidently it came to a sudden and violent end. An ancient Book says it happened in the days of Noah. - I am aware that some modern minds find it difficult to believe that the first world came to a violent end in the days of Noah - in spite of telltale scars all over the planet that strongly suggest it. The idea of a local catastrophe seems scientifically acceptable. But not a global one, they say. But the scriptures say nothing about a local, limited flood. -
"A local flood? Perhaps confined to the Mesopotamian Valley? That's what some say. But I have some interesting questions. Why would God tell Noah to spend more than a century building an ark to escape a local flood? Why not just tell him to move? Why not take him by the hand and lead him away from doom as He led Lot out of Sodom? And why would animals need to be preserved in the ark? Could not God have led these animals out of the doomed valley as easily as He could have led them into the ark? Or even if all the animals in the Mesopotamian Valley were destroyed, were there not enough outside the valley to perpetuate their species? And why were birds taken into the ark? Couldn't they fly away from the rising waters? The questions persist. The stated purpose of the Genesis judgment was to wipe out a degenerate race. How would the destruction of a race be accomplished by a local inundation? The whole account becomes absurd if the Deluge was not worldwide. - Could it be that the fossil record, the fossil sequence so intriguing to modern man, is not the record of long ages at all - but rather the chronicle, written in the rocks, of the terrible events of a single year, the year of the great flood? - Is there some strange tie between Hell and High Water? I think you will see that there is. Jesus said, "But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be". - "As things were in Noah's days, so will they be when the Son of man comes. In the days before the Flood they ate and drank and married, until the day that Noah went into the ark, and they knew nothing until the Flood came and swept them all away. That is how it will be when the son of man comes". Matthew 24:37-39.
"Surprised. And they didn't need to be. Noah had been building that boat for a century, and telling everybody why. Will our generation, too be surprised - when it doesn't need to be? Evidently. Noah's time was a time of global judgment. Is our? Listen to the words of the apostle Peter. "By water that first world was destroyed, the water of the Deluge. And the present heavens and earth, again by God's word, have been kept in store for burning". 2 Peter 3:6,7. Just as in that day waters from within the earth united with water from heaven to destroy the earth, so in the coming judgment, fire from within the earth will unite with fire from heaven at God's command. The fire is there, awaiting His reluctant use."
When we can accept the Noah Flood and the Sinking of Atlantis as the same Planetary Catastrophe, then we can accept the Top Strata of Earth was set down in the Flood, and anything found in the soil and rocks was from the Civilization before the Flood. We can also accept the Flood as a Planetary Flood. As Noah and his family repopulated the Earth, and people were still Misbred, the dysfunctional ones were driven out, and they also started many Societies. Today we try to lock up the dysfunctional ones, but we are finding out we are all genetically dysfunctional. Man must Serve the SOL with Balanced Elements, so if Man sets up the Unbalanced Elements, the consequences are built into the Elements. As Man set up the Unbalanced Elements that caused the Water Catastrophe, Man today has set up the Fire Judgement with the Unbalanced Elements of their High Tech. Our Planet is covered with our Nuclear waste and pollution on land and sea, that will in time catch fire and burn. Man is breaking the Ozone Canopy, with pollution, and this lets the ultraviolet rays of the Sun burn off the green element, that makes Oxygen needed for Life as we know it. The Bible is the Code Book for All the History and Myth, from Colonization, to the Fall, to the Noah/Atlantis Society, to the Flood, to the repopulation of Earth, to Jesus showing that you do not die and to Heaven/Space, but to in a regenerated Physical Body, to the Judgement Day Fire Catastrophe. I do not know of any other writings that cover the History of Earth for the past 12,000 years. It is time to have a High Tech translation of scriptures and myth and Understand where we are in the Birth Cycles of Heterosexual Body Birth.
The many different species before the Flood, caused by the genetics in the egg and sperm, are the same as the genetic strains we have today. We did not Evolve on Earth, but regressed from Higher High Tech Asexual Pure-bred Humans. We do carry the genetics of our HTA, only our are defective because of Human Bondage. Our HTA may have evolved somewhere else in Space, and, purified the genetics of the egg and sperm that they used, and Life on Earth was Colonized with this type of High Tech Reproduction. We reproduce by the Heterosexual Lower Nature of reproduction, with All the traits in the egg and sperm used, and no one knows which traits go into making a person. A family trait can show up that no one knows where it came from, because of lack of genetic and ancestor knowledge, or when a child was born by an unknown father that was not acknowledged, or an adoption that was not recorded in the family tree. We have many interesting things to rediscover about the Higher Nature of Eternal Physical Life. We are misusing our High Tech knowledge as the Society before the Flood did, and are again being inspired to see the error of our Body Birth Ways of Life. Without controlling the male seed, all the mixing of genetics is really showing up during our population explosion. The Killing of Planet Earth can be slowed down, if we Unite as One Society, and start correcting the Killing of all the Species, and the Killing of the Green Life Elements, needed to continue Life on Earth.
Are we willing to use the Wisdom of the Ages to Know the Truth of Asexual High Tech Birth, that will set us Free from Human Bondage and Death, and return to the Eternal Physical Life of our HTA? This is the Heaven that is taught about in religion, as the Life we get for 'Life after Death'. Life is for the Living, and the Eternal 'Life after Birth' of a Physical Everlasting High Tech Life, is possible on Earth and in Heaven/Space. If Physical Life did evolve somewhere in the Universe, it made our HTA on another Planet, either in our Solar System or farther out in Space. Our HTA did Colonized Earth, and we 'are' in their image. Physical Life did not evolve on Earth, and the High Tech Higher Beings are Colonizing Planets, like our Scientists hope to do someday.
The Gospel Truth. John 14:2. KJV. (Jesus) "In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you."
Our HTA are using the 6 Days of Creation on another Planet, to take a new Colony to, when Man ruins the Earth. We will be regenerated like Jesus was by High Tech, and we will get to restart on a Planet with the 'living experience' knowledge of what Heterosexual Body Birth does to a Planet. Are we ready to understand about the Asexual Eternal Physical Life, or will we perish in our Pollution that is setting up for the Judgement Day Fire? Are we ready to return to being the Asexual Caretaker Species instead of the Heterosexual Killer Species?
"Evolution or Special Creation? By Lewis Marsh, Ph.D. "Many honest-hearted men and women are asking the question, Are we actually blood descendants of amoebalike, fishlike, reptilelike, insectlike, apelike types, or was our earliest ancestor formed directly from the dust, the son of God? Would Christ die to save noble beasts, or did He give His life to redeem fallen sons and daughters of Adam, children of God? - The natural fact is before us. Plants and animals do exist in discontinuous clusters so that very little experience is necessary to distinguish a birch from a beech, a flying squirrel from a bat, or a man from a chimpanzee. The question arises quite naturally, What was the origin of all these basic types of organisms? - A number of processes of change in organism have been discovered. Of these, three have been studied painstakingly and are commonly known as recombinations, gene mutations, and chromosomal changes. However, it is extremely important to our understanding to bear in mind that 'in not one instance' have these processes, working singly or all together, accomplished more than a new 'variety' of a basic type of plant or animal 'which was already in existence'. - Evolutionists are very difficult to classify. Certainly, to say that they are either atheists, deists, theists, or agnostics is an oversimplification. It is very possible that no two evolutionists have identical philosophies in all details. Nevertheless, they do have one belief in common. That belief is that man is blood-related to the lower animals.
"In fact, according to their belief, every hereditary determiner in man has come to him from his amoebalike, fishlike, reptilelike, insectlike, apelike ancestors. Possibly it is a mere play on words, but actually, according to evolution, man does not have one drop of human blood in him. He is completely "of the beasts". The doctrine is a flat denial of Genesis 2:7, -. 'He only' was created in the image of God (Genesis 1:26,27). - I have yet to find a satisfactory definition of the doctrine of special creation in any dictionary or evolutionist textbook. This confusion with regard to the teachings of the modern doctrine of special creation cannot be blamed on evolutionists, because all they can do is define it as it was taught by the noted creationists named in the preceding paragraph. (Aristotle, Lamarck, Charles Darwin, Weismann, De Vries - Bonnet, Linnaeus, Cuvier and Agassiz.) - It is not uncommon in college science texts to run across the claim that the advance of natural science has shown scriptural assertions to be obsolete. The Bible, in common with man-made books, has suffered more or less from hasty, superficial, and careless readers. - This tendency to impute to the Bible, teachings that its literal text does not support has been prevalent for many centuries. Perhaps the most notorious period in history for inaccurate interpretation of scriptural statements having to do with natural phenomena was that of the Middle Ages, a period that in round numbers extended from A.D. 400 to A.D. 1400.
"During these centuries men in general, and even leaders in the Catholic Church, believed that the Bible taught (1) a flat earth with four corners, (2) a geocentric solar system in which the earth stood still at the center while the sun revolved around it, (3) spontaneous generation, which continually produced living forms from dead organic materials, (4) extreme fixity of species, (5) prenatal influence of the sight-transfer type, and (6) a worldwide Noachian Flood. In order to understand the attitude of modern science toward the Bible it is important to bear in mind that even today scientists quite generally believe that the six items listed in the paragraph above are actually Biblical teachings. History easily reveals the fact that church leaders of the Middle Ages 'did' present these interpretations as the teaching of the Scriptures on these points. In our evaluation of the Scriptures it is extremely vital that we distinguish between what the church leaders 'thought' the Bible said and what it actually does assert. We will consider rather briefly each of the six items that during the Middle Ages were considered to be scriptural teachings on these points. 1. 'Flat earth with four corners'. Isaiah 11:12, "He shall gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth", and Revelation 7:1, "I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, . The phrase "corners of the earth" is really a poetic expression that in plain speech means "the points of the compass". - (Aristotle, Eratosthenes, and Pythagoras taught a round earth) by the time of the Middle Ages men had returned to a belief in a flat earth. The fact that the church leaders of that period 'believed' that the Bible taught a flat earth is interpreted by most modern scientists to mean that the Bible 'actually teaches' a flat earth. -
"In this way it came about that when it was demonstrated by coercive evidence that the earth was round, scientists mistakenly believed that they had proved the 'Bible' wrong on that point of natural science. 2. "A geocentric solar system;. we find appearing frequently in our speech the expressions "sunrise" and "sunset", Interestingly, however, we find people who insist that when these same expressions regarding the rising and setting of the sun appear in the Bible they 'must mean' that the Bible writers believed our earth stood still in the center of the solar system. - However, we must bear in mind that during the middle Ages the man on the street, and also the Fathers of the church, understood that the earth 'did' stand at the center of the solar system and that the sun 'did' move around it. And because the Fathers of the church interpreted the Bible as teaching just that, scientists 'today' still believe that the Scriptures teach a geocentric solar system. - The only thing that most scientists of our day get from this embarrassing experience of the church (Galileo) is the mistaken conclusion that the Bible must teach a stationary earth with the sun revolving around it. Imbued with a strange exuberance, they chalk up what they 'think' is Item 2, where man has assumedly proved the Bible to be wrong in matters of natural science. largely because it accepted Aristotle's explanations in natural science, one of which was spontaneous generation, the church taught that these commands in Genesis were still actively effective in the earth. Strangely the church schoolmen failed to read the whole Creation story.
"According to Genesis, God gave these commands for the reproduction of plants and animals only on days three, five, and six, when He was placing in the earth the basic types of all living things. Then after the earth was supplied with the self-reproducing organisms that God considered sufficient, - "God 'ended' his work ". Thus God filled a deficiency by commanding the earth to bring forth. But after the deficiency was corrected and the earth was outfitted according to plan, the recorded is that "God ended His work". - Thus, actually, there is no Biblical basis for the assumption that the earth was still generating living things from the nonliving. But such was the teaching of the Catholic Church because the church of the Middle Ages interpreted the Bible that way, modern scientists are generally of the opinion that the Bible teaches spontaneous generation. - The significant point we wish to illuminate here is the fact that the leaders in the Catholic Church of the Middle Ages inaccurately thought that Genesis taught spontaneous generation. And because the church promulgated this invalid interpretation of the Scriptures, modern scientists insist that the Bible does teach abiogenesis, and that they can chalk up Item 3 in which modern science has proved the Bible to be inaccurate in natural science. 4. 'Extreme fixity of species'. As far as the written record goes, the Greek philosopher Aristotle was about the only man after Adam and before the time of Christ who gave much thought to the basic types among plants and animals. - The noted Church Father Augustine, later sainted by the church, appears as the first Christian to show any particular interest in the origin of plants and lower animals. -
"Because Aristotle conceived of all the types of plants and animals having been formed by a Creator, and because Augustine was not sufficiently read in biology to be able to criticize Aristotle's explanation, he decided that Aristotle's philosophy with regard to origin of kinds was harmonious with the record of Genesis. - Because of the vagueness of Aristotle's philosophy of origins, it had sufficient latitude to be accepted generally by scientists both inside and outside the church. However, beginning just after the middle of the sixteenth century, a marked reformation occurred within the church on the point of origins. - What Darwin actually found disturbed him greatly. Everywhere he went, instead of nature's showing evidence that the basic types had been specially created and set in the places where he found them, plants, and animals appeared to have migrated over the earth and varied somewhat as they spread into distant lands. - The tragedy of Darwin lies in his misunderstanding of the teaching of Genesis. He was content to let men who obviously were poor scholars read his Bible for him and tell him what it taught. Genesis asserts that organisms were created in distinct kinds, not species, and that some sixteen or seventeen centuries after Creation a world wide Flood destroyed all land animals except those preserved in Noah's ark. This ark grounded "upon the mountains of Ararat", and from that spot in Asia Minor life spread out over all the land areas. This migration was exactly what Darwin observed. Unwittingly he had discovered the truth of Genesis in its portrayal of the replenishing of the earth by basic types, which traveled out over the earth, varying within the limits of the kind as they went. -
"Everywhere he went he saw evidences of variation, but at 'no' place did he see the origin of new basic types by variation. If he had read Genesis carefully he would have learned that kinds were 'created', not developed gradually through processes of change. - It is thus through a failure to read Genesis carefully that scientists in general chalk up Item 4 where man has assumedly proved the Bible wrong in an assertion on natural science. 5. 'Prenatal influence of the sight-transfer type'. This is the kind of prenatal influence in which it is assumed that a pregnant female looks upon some natural object, say a snake, and stamps a likeness of the object upon the surface of the fetus she is carrying. Scientists have demonstrated over and over again that such a transmission does not occur. One reason why it cannot occur is the fact that the nervous system of the mother is not continuous with that of the fetus. The umbilical cord, which extends from the placenta to the fetus, contains no nervous tissue capable of transmitting impulses. In other words, there is no physical mechanism by which something seen by the mother can be reproduced on the surface of her offspring. - The Biblical story leaves no doubt that Jacob 'believed' that such a transfer was possible. He prepared spotted and ringed sticks and set them before Laban's cows and goats and sheep. He appeared quite well-pleased with himself in this trick on his uncle. - God finally sent an angel who appeared to Jacob in a dream and told him that the increase of his flocks was a result of the blessing of God working through the laws of heredity in Jacob's behalf, not the result of the marked sticks. -
"When two recessives met at the fertilization of the egg, Jacob's colors were produced. God's blessing upon Jacob meant that two recessives met more often than either dominants or a dominant and a recessive. Thus the teaching of the Bible upon this subject is in harmony with demonstrated science. It does 'not' teach prenatal influence of the sight-transfer type. Genesis 31 reveals the actual Biblical portrayal on the subject of heredity. Men of the Middle Ages believed in sight-transfer. Many scientists are mistakenly of the opinion that the Bible teaches this type of inheritance, and as a result of their careless reading, or lack of reading, they chalk up Item 5 where they assert that the Scriptures are obsolete on a point of natural science. 6. "A worldwide Noachian Flood'. It is a regrettable fact that during past centuries the church characteristically opposed any advancement in natural science. Discoveries by scientists, such as the relative heretical doctrines, which merited excommunication for their originators. The area of geology was no exception. The pious at first resisted the idea that fossils had once been living organisms, and attributed them to a mysterious 'plastic force", or assumed them to be mere 'freaks of nature" or even "devices of the devil". Some suggested that they had been hidden in the ground by God (or by the devil) in order to test the faith of man. However, when the organic nature of fossils could no longer be doubted, it occurred to the church belatedly that here was a powerful support for the Bible. Accordingly fossil remains of animals, from large salamanders to mastodons, were explained to be remnants of human beings drowned in the Noachian Flood. -
"As in the case of Charles Darwin, who was driven from acceptance of the Genesis record because of the church's interpretation of extreme fixity, it came about that as a result of the extreme and fantastic interpretations of Biblical references to a worldwide deluge, scientists were wearied with it all and came to believe that the Genesis account of the Flood was purely imaginative and had come from the superstitious tales of the Babylonians. The objects that should have helped greatly in Showing that there had been a worldwide Flood were explained by churchmen in ways so obviously inaccurate as to foster a desire in thoughtful and observant individuals to be completely rid of any idea of a universal deluge. - A total supernatural destruction of the crust of the earth at the time of the worldwide Noachian Flood is the only adequate explanation of what we see in the first several vertical miles of the earth's surface. But the misplaced faith of most scientists in the uniformitarian principle leads them to think that they have disproved the worldwide Flood described in Genesis, and they chalk up Item 6 where they think the Bible is inaccurate in assertions about natural science. - The complete harmony between the facts of nature and God's Word, as well as the profound significance of these basic truths, is a source of endless delight to the thoughtful student of natural science. Rather than being obsolete in biology, chemistry, geology, and physics, the assertions of the Bible not only accurately explain the basic facts of today but also illuminate the future. -
"For this particular review of natural facts it is extremely important for us to realize that in all the thousands of cases of mutations that have been studied, mutational change has never accomplished more than to produce a new variety of an organism already in existence. No new basic types of plants or animals have been observed to arise through mutational change. In like manner, the type of hereditary variation known as 'recombination' cannot produce new basic types, because it consists merely of a reshuffling of genes that are already on hand. - If it were not so serious it would be amusing to see the close similarity between the present setting of the stage and the situation between science and the church during the Middle Ages. Today scientists generally decry that age of authority in which the church maintained a strangle hold upon even the thoughts of men. - The comparison with our day is striking because now, in our age of exaggerated scientism, we also live in an age of worship of authority. At this particular moment the church is no longer in authority, but science is. The popular churches follow obediently along on the coattails of science, sprinkling holy water on just about any opinion of the moment that science may come up with. Science is now enthralled with the obsession of evolution, a preoccupation that causes men to resist almost violently the conception of a special creation in the image of God, in favor of a blood relationship with beasts. The evidences are no more coercive than the epicycles of Ptolemy, but modern scientists are just as positive their interpretation is correct as were the churchmen, unsupported from the Bible, and dependent in their opinion upon the interpretation of Hipparchus and Ptolemy, when they compelled Galileo to recant and goose-step with them in their errors.
"The church of that day was very sure that their current dogma was for the good of mankind. The scientists of our day are likewise very sure that it is for the general good that we all believe in evolution. - In Galileo's day the power in authority attempted to crush the minority opinion, an opinion now known to be the truth. Is it not possible that in our day man would employ similar ruthless tactics to crush the idea of special creation if only he had the power to do it? And again it would be a case where pertinent evidence was as completely subjective as Ptolemy's epicycles. The facts involved here are clear enough, but they 'demonstrate neither evolution nor special creation'. Being persuasive in quality, they can be bent this way or that, depending upon what the student wishes to prove. - The Bible makes it clear that in order to reveal His love to man, God created a perfect world outfitted to make man completely happy, one in which each plant and animal was specially created and fitted into its complex environmental niche. The completed creation constituted a system in which no death of animals occurred. Through the warp of plant life was woven the beautiful woof of animal life where all kinds existed harmoniously. It was a peaceful creation produced by a God of love, a creation in which the created forms neither hurt nor destroyed. "It was very good". The Bible also makes it clear that into this perfect creation stepped the destroyer, a being with an imagined case against the great Creator, which could be proved false only by permitting this being, formerly Lucifer, now Satan, to demonstrate what he could do. Our earth became the scene of a controversy between Christ and Satan in the natural world.
"It immediately began to be obvious to the universe that Satan's claim to an ability to run things on this earth better than the Creator, was false, and this inability has just about reached its complete demonstration before the entire universe. Satan's great hatred against Christ, the Creator manifests itself in the destruction and derangement of much that was originally beautifully ordered and harmonious. Through manipulation of natural processes he has brought in the harsh order of bloody fang and claw. Where the original creation was completely harmonious, with no order of survival in which the strongest and most cruel won, we now live in a world where might makes right. This temporary reign of hate with its law of tooth and claw has very nearly stamped out the delicate, the refined, the lovely, and the fair. These degenerations are the work of a god of hate, and are a wide departure from the perfection and harmony established here originally by the God of love. - When man gives heed to the Guidebook he finds that God's creation was perfect and completely harmonious. By man's refusal to follow the advice of his Creator and through his contrary determination to follow a course of action exactly opposite to that suggested to him by his maker, the god of destruction gained entrance into our world. The terrible result has been so complete a disfigurement of nature as to place it beyond the power of man, unassisted, the discover the truth about it. That nature all too often shows the work of a god of hate goes without argument.
"Unless a person is a student of God's Word and learns the facts about the present controversy he may become confused and at times even doubt the existence of a God of love. God in His foreknowledge foresaw the development of sin and the increasing need of man for a Guidebook. The blame for a failure to be informed on these basic truths now lies entirely at the door of him who refuses the Bible. The World of God knows but one origin for living things. They appeared by special creation in the six 24-hour days of Creation week. Creation was a perfect work - there was nothing of trial and error, chance, or competition, with a survival of the fittest. Every organism fitted harmoniously into the over-all picture so that the web of life, displaying no bloodstains, was marvelously intricate and beautiful to behold, and worthy of its omniscient, omnipotent Author. Man was formed of common material with the beasts, but he was distinct from them, sharing no common blood. He enjoyed the significant distinction of being made in the image of God, a son of God. The Word of God portrays a glorious future for man because he was created a son in God's image and is thus a member of the household of God. We can look forward with every assurance that in the near future nature will be clean from all disharmony and every defilement of sin. The beautiful accord of the original Eden will be restored, and man will continue to enjoy soul-satisfying fulfillment through the ceaseless reaches of eternity."
It is time to control the seed of the male, to stop all the Misbreeding, and Division, Disease and Death. Heterosexual Body Birth is the Lucifer/Satan of Life. Christ is Balanced Elements and the Caretakers of Eternal Physical Life. Anti-Christ is Unbalanced Elements and Physical Death, and the Killers of Life. Whom does Man Serve? Accepting the Planetary Flood will do away with Evolution theories on Earth, because almost all Life was destroyed, and restarted in the Mid-East where Noah landed. All the debris of the civilization before the Flood is all over the Earth and in the seas. The fossil remains are not millions of years old. The Ark was a large as the Titanic Ocean Liner, so its cargo was sufficient to start the repopulation of the Earth. They carried 7 pairs of clean beasts, and 1 pair of unclean beasts (Genesis 7). Another misteaching by religion is that it carried only 1 pair of each. Then man and beast migrated all around the Earth, in the temperate zones first. The history that is recorded about the past civilizations, list that most of them migrated like the spokes of a wheel, from the Euphrates area. Some of the past histories may be about the World Before The Flood, such as Atlantis and Mu, and ancient Greece with the gods and goddess that had perfect bodies, with which Man was created in the beginning. We have only had a civilization that most citizens read about, for the past 400 years, when the printing press was made. This made an explosion in the interpretations of the Scriptures and many religious, myths, and civil manuscripts. It is time to retranslate all of this with a High Tech understanding. We may be surprised by how 'literal' all the teachings are about the 'supernatural'. High Tech is 'super'natural.