How did Life start on Earth? We have the High Tech today to know how to Colonize a Planet, and Genesis 1 is the blueprint to follow in the steps for the 6 Days/6000 years to set up the atmosphere, the water and land, the green grass, bushes, etc., needed to make oxygen, and then the species were added. This is how our Asexual High Tech Ancestors (HTA) Colonized/Created Life on Earth, and they created the Original Asexual Colony of Adam and Eve by High Tech. The High Tech Birth Humans are Caretakers of Life on their Planet. The Heterosexual Body Birth Humans are Killers of the Life on their Planet. After the "Fall" of the Original Colony to Heterosexual Body Birth, our HTA withdrew their High Tech labs from the Garden of Eden, and Man had to go through the experience of the Lower Nature of the Species man, in genetic, dysfunctional bodies, instead of the perfect bodies of High Tech Birth. Angels was the designation given to people that can fly in the sky. Our HTA were called Angels because they can fly in the sky/heaven. The Fallen Original Colony became know as the Fallen Angels, as they could no longer fly in the Space. Now 6000 has passed and we are in a population explosion, because there is no control over the seed of the male. Whatsoever Man sows that also shall they reap. We can see what a Killer Society we are today, with the starvation, pollution, and our nuclear weapons of massive destruction. Is this what Man was Created To Be. To Be or not To Be, that 'is' the question. Our HTA are miscalled God by religion, but they are the Man Gods of religion and myth, that were seen and spoke to many down through time. The One God of the Hydrogen Atom Universes, is the Source of Life (SOL), that is the One God of religion that no one has ever seen.
K.C. STAR, 5/16/98. "Q&A" "Humans have soul and dominion over the creatures" "Q. What do you think is the difference between human beings and animals? I believe there isn't any because humans are just a higher, smarter form of animal. I think all the talk about us having a soul or spirit is unscientific and is something people dreamed up to make us feel superior to animals. - B.V."
"A. The Rev. Billy Graham: I love animals; they've been a part of my life since my earliest childhood days growing up on a farm. Even if I weren't a Christian, I think I would have to admit that there is a vast gap between humans and animals, a gap that can't be explained only in terms of intelligence. Can I prove to you scientifically that humans have a soul or spirit, or that we alone are made in the image of God, as the Bible says? No, I can't, any more than you can prove scientifically that we don't have souls. But that doesn't mean they don't exist. You cannot prove scientifically that there is such a thing as love, for example, but that doesn't keep people from falling in love all the time. Let me challenge you to investigate what you can know. Almost 2,000 years ago, there was a man by the name of Jesus Christ. He claimed to be more than a man. He claimed to be God in human form, sent from heaven. Is that claim true? Millions have said it is, and you can, too."
"A. The Rev. David O. Shipley Sr., retired pastor, second Baptist Church of Kansas City: Upon reading your question, my mind immediately went to several scriptures in the Holy Bible. It speaks clearly about the position and responsibility given to human beings. "And God said, let us make man in our own image, after our likeness and let him have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowls of the air, and over the cattle over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth" (Genesis 1:26). In reading Psalms 8:4-8, the question is raised, "What is man, that thou art mindful of him thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet". Nothing else in all creation was given the status of being made in the image of God. Many great things have been done by human beings - great advancements in the arts, technology, human and health sciences. It also is true that there are human beings who often have been abusive of power. Instead of finding great delight in God's garden of creation, many times human beings have sought to reduce this greatness to their own finite mind of selfishness, prejudice or for personal gain and authority - changing the configuration of all things to make them subservient to themselves.
"For example, animals are captured, domesticated and used in theme parks and zoos, and after serving their usefulness they often are destroyed. Some animals are selected and given great care - special food, toys, clothing, beds and occupy a prominent place in the human family. Then there are those that are used for retail purposes. This is not only the scenario of animals, but it sometimes happens to humans as well. Because of the failure of humankind in seeing the value of all life. God sent his son into the world to offer redemption and to redeem man from his sinful nature, offering to those who believe in him life eternal. However, when it comes to the future of the lower form of animal life, the Bible is silent. We must be cognizant of the fact that because God is the creator of everything, he also has the ability to preserve that which he wishes. Whatever God does is good!"
"A. Lama Chuck Stanford, founder, Mindfulness Meditation Foundation: From the Buddhist tradition, 'all' sentient beings desire happiness and try to avoid suffering. This is true of animals as well as humans. However, animals are ruled by instinct and of course lack the intellectual ability of humans. Both humans and animals have what is called, "Buddha-nature". Buddha-nature is the true, enduring and eternal nature of all beings. It is because of Buddha-nature that it is possible for all beings to obtain enlightenment and become a Buddha. However, it is our intelligence that sets us apart from the animal world. This is both a curse as well as a blessing. Our intelligence has caused us to inflict unspeakable atrocities against one another that even animals wouldn't commit. But it is also our intelligence that gives us the potential to do spiritual practice that can develop deep compassion for ourselves, for one another and even for animals. As humans, we have the ability to understand that our actions can cause pain and suffering to ourselves and others. We also have the intellect and capacity to do spiritual practices that can liberate us from this cycle of existence. It is for this reason that we should have great compassion for animals because in many ways they are trapped and are unable to do spiritual practices that could liberate them. Meditation is one way that we can develop great insight and compassion. The practice of meditation is simple moment-to-moment awareness. I believe that it is both our ability and desire to develop compassion to aid all sentient beings, that distinguishes us from the animal realm." (Stanford recently was ordained a lama in the Nyingma lineage of Tibetan Buddhism.)
"Guide To Survival" By Salem Kirban. "Time magazine in a recent essay on pollutants said the following: "Man has tended to ignore the fact that he is utterly dependent on the biosphere: a vast web of interacting processes and organisms that form the rhythmic cycles and food chains in which one part of the living environment feeds on another. The biosphere is no immutable feature of the earth years ago, terrestrial life consisted of some primitive organisms that consumed oxygen as fast as green plants manufactured it. Only by some primeval accident were the greedy organisms buried in sedimentary rock (as the source of crude oil, for example), thus permitting the atmosphere to become enriched to a life-sustaining mix of 20% oxygen, plus nitrogen, argon, carbon dioxide and water vapor. With miraculous precision, the mix was then maintained by plants and animals and bacteria, which used and returned the gasses at equal rates. About 70% of the earth's oxygen is thus produced by ocean plytoplankton: passively floating plants. All this modulated temperatures, curbed floods, and neutered man thousands of years ago."
This is partly right. Some of the elements were in the soupy atmosphere around earth, and our HTA sent a blue-green algae bomb into it to separate the water and gases to make our Ice-crystal Canopy and Ozone Canopy and the seas, so Earth could support Life as we know it. Blue-green algae is needed for Life On Earth, and our Ocean pollution is destroying it. A Planet that has the right atmospheric layers set up, can go through two deaths, or can be kept Balanced, and the Life on the Planet can live forever, until its Sun/Star dies, and then they have the High Tech to escape to another Solar System. The First Death is the Water Death, the breaking of the Ice-crystal Layer, that caused the Noah/Atlantis Planetary Flood Catastrophe, by their Unbalanced High Tech. The Second Death is the Fire Death, which will destroy the Ozone Layer, that burns off the green needed by our type of Life to exist. Both of these deaths are caused by the Fallen Species Man, not by God or the Devil, as we are experiencing the breaking of the Ozone Layer today, by Man's Unbalanced High Tech. Our disrespect of Balanced Life Elements will destroy all the Physical Life, we call Civilization.
K.C. STAR, 6/1/98. "Bible and science don't conflict" By Billy Graham. "Q. We are studying about the origins of the human race in my science class. How do you reconcile science and the Bible? I grew up in a church, but I wonder if the Bible is out of date. - M.B."
"A. The Bible is not out of date, and the Bible and science are not in conflict, not if we understand them both correctly. In fact, some of the most brilliant scientists I have ever met are also firm believers in God. God created the whole universe and when a scientist explores the world, he or she is examining God's creation. As the Bible says, "Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made" (John 1:3). I hope you will remember three things as you seek answers. First, while they do not contradict each other, science and the Bible do approach the world and life from different standpoints. Science tells us about the created world; the Bible tells us about the Creator and his love for us. Second, many of the so-called problems between science and the Bible really have to do with scientific theories, not facts. Finally, may your interest in science turn you toward God, not away from him. Nothing is greater than knowing the God of the universe personally - and we can, as we come to him through Christ."
The SOL created the Atom, and through the Atom are all things made in the Hydrogen Atom Universes. The Atom could be considered the 'Son' of the SOL. We are all made of Atoms and could be considered 'Children of God'. We are at One with God/Life John 1:3 is used by religion to mean God and his Son Jesus. Another analogy is to use the Sun for the Son. Can there be Life on a Planet without a Sun? Can there be a Planet without a Sun? Man must Serve the SOL with Balanced Elements, not 'worship' a Man 'God' in temples made by Human Hands, with the hope for 'Eternal Life After Death'. What 'is' Life After Death? Man should not destroy the SOLs Temple which is Eternal Physical Life and Balanced Elements, needed for Eternal Life After Birth.
"Malfunctions" of Nature?" By Edward F. Bowman. Forward. - This world of ours is full of scientific mysteries, some of which pertain to strange happenings involving our planet, and the sky above us. One such mystery is "What happened to the water of Noah's Flood, which covered the entire earth?" Another question is, "How was Joshua's Long Day brought about?" A still greater mystery is "how could the Sun set twice in the same day, as occurred in Hezekiah's time?" According to the law of Celestial Mechanics, there should be a planet between Mars and Jupiter. Instead, however, there has been several thousand fragments found in that space. What happened there? How? Why? These and other mystifying topics are discussed in the following pages. In each of the cases involved, the testimony of Astronomy, Geology, History, and the Bible, are brought out into the open." -
Book. "In the first chapter of Genesis, verses 6 and 7, we find that there was water above the firmament (atmospheric heavens) as well as the water below, which was grouped together into seas. Without doubt, the Earth at that time must have been completely surrounded by a sheet of water in one of its forms, such as vapor, cloud, mist, or even water as we know it today. This would be physically similar to a marble representing earth, inside of, or surrounded by a soap bubble to represent the waters above the firmament. - This "bubble" would make the atmosphere of a more equal density and pressure at all altitudes as the weight of this water sheet was surely supported aloft by the pressure of air beneath it, somewhat similar to the air inside an automobile tire which supports the car's weight. The sun's rays shining through the "bubble" (or we might call it a transparent "thermos bottle") would, as if re-fracted by a giant lens, be somewhat spread apart in the equatorial regions to temper the heat gathered at the polar regions to prevent frozen conditions; thereby giving the Earth an even climate, or nearly so, all over its surface. - After the flood the next Biblical record of a disturbance in the Earth's normal routine, is that of Joshua's Long Day. This event occurred in 1451 B.C. (897 years after Noah's Flood). We read "So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven and hasted not to go down about a whole day", Joshua 10:12-14. Most Christian astronomers are of an opinion that it lacked only 40 minutes less than two full days in length.
"They also conclude that the forty minute period was caught up to equal the extra full day (of Joshua's Long Day), in 709 B.C., just 742 years later, (II Kings 20:1-11), when one of the strangest astronomical events ever recorded took place. On this occasion, the sun set normal as usual, but returned above the western horizon and set again 40 minutes later. Just imagine! Two sunsets the same evening! It seems quite evident that on the opposite side of the earth, there was a counterpart of Joshua's Long Day in a Long Night of similar length; and for Hezekiah's double sunset, there must have been a double sunrise in a narrow belt approximately 155 degrees west longitude in the South Pacific Ocean: (half way around the earth from the 35 degrees east longitude, where Hezekiah was at that time.) It is also evident these events were caused by a shifting of Earth's axis, and if true, such a shift would be not entirely a geological, but equally as much of an astronomical problem. Spacing Of The Planets According To Bode's Law. 0+4 = 4 (Mercury) - 3+4 = 7 (Venus) - 6+4 = 10 (Earth) - 12+4 = 16 (Mars) - 24+4 =28 (Asteroids) - 48+4 = 52 (Jupiter) - 96+4 = 100 (Saturn) - 192+4 = (Uranus). - Each number in Bode's law except #28 represents the distance of a planet from the sun. For years, #28 remained a mystery, for no planet was found there. - Each year since then (1801), anywhere from one to one hundred (baby planets) have been added, until now the number has increased to include several thousand, and they are grouped into eight separate groups, or "families". -
"Olbers, suggested that these baby planets (now called Asteroids) were but fragments of a regular (normal) planet that had "exploded". One prevailing theory among many "evolution oriented" scientists today, however, is that the Asteroids are material that "somehow" has never yet been formed into a planet. - We have thus proven the interplanetary Power of gravity: Therefore, we have no real grounds for doubting that the difference between scattered and collective gravity in the case of planet space #28 could really disrupt some of the established motions of our earth sufficiently to cause the phenomenon of Noah's Flood, Joshua's Long Day, Hezekiah's Double Sunset, and the like in addition to being the physical cause behind Meteor showers, comets, and other similar phenomena. - Instead of, or perhaps even in addition to, an exploding planet theory, there is also another interesting possibility. Let us examine that theory, also. These unnatural events may have been caused by a "Cosmic Cloud coming between the sun and the earth, thus altering the sun's gravitational (and/or other) controls over the earth's motions, and causing axial shifts. Each of these possibilities (or theories) pose an astronomical problem. - If the waters of Noah's flood covered the entire Earth, what happened to that water. Where is it now? Some have thought the Biblical story of the universal flood was not true, for the water, so they reason, would have no place to recede. -
"Can you imagine the earth spinning at its revolving speed of 1000 miles per hour without the water in its oceans having "some tendency" to fly outward into space? Of course, gravity of the earth prevents its escape; however, it would seem that there would be enough "tendency to lift" the water to some extent, and of course, we can believe that . Let us suppose that the water surface in Mid-Atlantic was found to be, say, perhaps 15,000 to 20,000 feet higher than the earth's natural curvature would indicate. If this were true, and should the centrifugal force now holding it in restraint be released, and if the water locked up in frozen polar regions would melt, together they would cover the entire earth again. Yes, Noah's Flood waters must still be on the earth."
"The Catholic KEY" 2/22/19'76'. "Let Us Make Man" By Rev. Paul F. Palmer, S.J. "How old is the universe? If you consult the dateline of a newspaper in Tel Aviv you will learn that the religious Jew lives in the year 5736 from the first day of creation. If you consult the modern scientist he will talk in the language of light years that stagger the mind. It was not until the period of the Babylonian exile in the sixth century B.C. that the Israelites were challenged by the creation stories in circulation to write a creation history of their own. The history is known as the "P" or Priestly account of creation (Gen. 1:1-4a), and is distinguished from the "Y" or Yahwist account of the story of the first man, written four centuries earlier. Until these two accounts were written under the inspiration of God, the Israelites were not particularly interested in a transcendant God, the maker of the universe and the Father of all men. Enough that Yahweh was their God and they were Yahweh's sons; more than enough that Yahweh was the husband of Israel and Israel Yahweh's chosen bride. Enough that their God was better than all other rival gods and that what these other gods could do, Yahweh could do better. Like small children, they delighted in proving that "my father is bigger and better than your father". But now they were to learn from God's revelation through the Law and the Prophets that Yahweh was not only the God of Abraham but the only God, that Yahweh had made a covenant not only with Israel but with all men.
"Most important they would learn that unlike the Babylonian gods who evolved from the chaotic waters, their God has no beginning, that He simply is, that Elohim is present before the heavens and the earth are created by Him, that the Spirit of God is over the waters of chaos to prepare for the first day of God's work week which will set the pattern for man's week of work before his rest on the Sabbath. The "school" of priests who fashioned the stanzas of the opening hymn of creation were no more scientific than their Babylonian counterparts. But they had the inspired good sense not to confuse the world with their God, nor to people that sun and the moon and the stars with gods to be worshipped by man. Unlike the modern astronomer who is at times overawed by the galaxies and star clusters which dwarf man and his little earth, the priestly account of creation, for all the lack of science, is wise in keeping God, man and the universe in proper perspective. The universe was made for man and man was made for God. The "P" account gets off to a good scientific start when it has God say: "Let there be light", for without light there can be no life. But the "light" of the first day is not the exploding and expanding universe of light that we associate with the stars. The lights described by "P" are simply the lighting fixtures for the home of man, who is to arrive on the sixth day.
"They are to be signs in the heavens to tell man the seasons of the year, the days of the month and the hour of the day which, for purposes of religious observance, begins with the evening before. "And God said, 'Let there be lights in the firmament And God made the two great lights, the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night; he made the stars also" (1:14-16). This reference to the stars, by way of afterthought, has to be the understatement of all literature. For the astronomer it is a legitimate cause for amusement; for the astrologer a form of blasphemy. But for the Hebrew Psalmist the afterthought kept things in divine and human perspective: When I look at thy heavens, the work of they fingers, the moon and the stars which thou hast established; what is man that thou art mindful of him, and the son of man that thou dost care for him? Yet thou hast made him little less than God, and dost crown him with glory and honor. Thou hast given him dominion over the work of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet O Lord, our Lord, how majestic is thy name in all the earth!" (Ps. 8:3-9).
"The question asked by the Psalmist is rhetorical. It presupposes the crowning achievement of God as Creator, the work of the sixth day: "Then God said, 'Let us make man in our image, after our likeness'. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. And God blessed them, and God said to them, 'Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it'" (1:26-28). The book of Genesis with the opening hymn of creation is still a closed book to many people. But God did not limit his revelation to the pages of a book. Made to the image of God, man is the best revelation of God; and the Man Jesus, God's only-begotten Son, the second Adam, is the most perfect revelation of the Father. Today, the Christian man and the Christian woman will be the only bible that the vast majority of people will ever read. God grant that we be worth the reading!"
In Genesis 1:26-28, Be fruitful is stated first. This means in an Asexual High Tech Society Man makes the housing and food first and then make more people, not the opposite Way of the Heterosexual Society that has many homeless and starving people. Many dysfunctional people were cast out of Society, to make their own Way. They still have their intelligence, but without technology, they made the best lifestyle they could, just as our natives do today. This happened after the 'Fall' to Body Birth, and then when Man started again after the 'Flood', Human Bondage continued. Knowledge needs to be understood about Man's Lifestyles, as to the top strata of the Earth, before and after the Noah/Atlantis Planetary Flood.
K.C. TIMES, 5/19/19'83'. "Scientists edging closer to answers on origin of man" San Francisco - "Hidden among ancient bones and crude tools, among a few tribes that have escaped civilization and among complex bands of apes could be the answer to one of humanity's most basic questions: Who are we? Some of the world's top anthropologists reviewed an explosion of information about man's beginnings recently and offered some interpretations and speculation. They talked of men who first stood upright 4 million years ago so their hands would be free to bring food to their families; of women who may have made the first tools long before men; of fire taken from nature to keep beasts at bay; of honeymooning apes; and of fierce squads of chimpanzees that attached wandering strangers. The scientists met at a symposium sponsored by the L.S. B. Leakey Foundation, which finances wide-ranging research into human origins. The question of who we are has not been answered, they said, and for every theory there's a countertheory. But they say the answer is certainly worth searching for. "We often get the feeling this is just something that happened a long time ago", said Sherwood Washburn of the University of California at Berkeley. "But we are the living fossils. We are the products of evolution. We are as we are because of what happened long ago".
"The clock was pushed back in 1979 with the discovery in Ethiopia of a series of hominid - humanlike - fossils highlighted by a skeleton dubbed Lucy. The fossils remain a subject of debate. But most agree the finds pushed the date hominids appeared back to about 4 million years ago, Lucy and the others were in many ways more ape than human, with brains scarcely larger than those of chimpanzees, but they walked upright. C. Owen Lovejoy of Kent State University contends the anatomical evidence is clear: "They are exclusively bipedal and they have abandoned arboreal activities:. In other words, by 4 million years ago man's ancestors abandoned the trees, stood up straight and walked on two legs. Mr. Lovejoy says they had to have had good reason to resort to such an inefficient way of getting around and to leave the safety of the treetops for the perils of the ground. He contends the apelike creatures may have stood so they could use their hands to bring food back to their families. "Basically", he contends, "the earliest form of adaptation in man's history was the form of adaptation in man's history was the formation of monogamous relationships".
"J. Desmond Clark of Berkeley said some of the earliest humans may have used - but not made - simple tools, much as chimpanzees are know to crush nuts with rocks and gather termites by dipping sticks into their hills. Evolution moved slowly for 2 million years, Mr. Clark said. "Then, quite suddenly, around 2 million years ago, the (fossil record provides evidence of major change - a much larger brain and the appearance of the first stone tools", he said. By this time, he said, our ancestors were "middle-of-the-day scroungers, scavengers and hunters of small game". - Irven Devore of Harvard University, after years of studying the few remaining African hunter-gatherer bands, said that when these bands taste the modern world, "The are almost always determined to get out of the planter-gatherer business altogether. For 90 percent of our history as a species, we lived as hunter-gatherers".
K.C. TIMES, 4/3/19'85'. "Scientific data point to the origin of life in clay rather than water" New York - "Scientists in California on Tuesday reported a discovery that supports the emerging theory that life on Earth began in clay rather than the sea. The discovery announced at a symposium, showed that ordinary clay contains two basic properties essential to life: the capacities to store and transfer energy. With such energy, coming from radioactive decay and other sources, the early clays could have acted as "chemical factories" for processing inorganic raw materials into the more complex molecules from which the first life arose some 4 billion years ago. In their analysis of common ceramic clay, the scientists said, they found evidence that "mistakes" made normally and repeatedly in the formation of clay crystals presumably create the conditions by which the material traps energy and holds it for perhaps thousands of years. Such defects in the clay microstructure could also be sites for storing information necessary to direct the chemical reactions and organize the eventual proto-organisms. So if the theory can be confirmed, it would seem that an accumulation of chemical mistakes led to life on Earth. The theory is also evocative of the biblical account of the Creation. In Genesis, it is written, "And the Lord God formed man of dust of the ground", and in common usage this primordial dust is called clay.
"The research was conducted by a team of scientists at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Ames Research Center in Mountain View, Calif., where studies of the origin of life have been under way for years, in part to learn how to search for life on other worlds. The leader was Lelia Coyne, a research associate at Ames and also at San Jose State University. She described the findings, the result of research begun in the 1970s, at a symposium at Ames and in a telephone interview. - Subsequent research suggested that clay has the ability to act as a catalyst in important chemical reactions and could even be capable of such lifelike attributes as self-replication. - Alternative proposals, suggesting that life reached Earth from outer space in the form of hardy spores, beg the fundamental question of life-forming forces. - According to the research, the clay minerals appear to be able to store and transfer energy through the temporary capture of highly energetic electrons at sites of irregularities in the clay's interior structure."
K.C. STAR, 1990-93. "Did you know?" "The climate of the Earth has changed or fluctuated many times in the last 4 billion years. Scientists uncovered the evidence in rocks, fossils and old landforms, such as glaciated mountains, fossil sand dunes and coal deposits, which are the relics of ancient tropical forests. Until very recently it was the opinion of most scientists that major climatic changes were slow and gradual."
K.C. STAR, 1990-93. "Did you know?" "At one time the Earth's land surface made up a single primeval continent of 80 million square miles now termed Pangaes. Pangaes split about 190 million years ago, during the Jurassic period, into two super continents named Laurasia (Eurasia, Greenland and North America) and Gondwanaland (Africa, Arabia, India, South America, Oceania and Antarctica).
K.C. STAR, 1990-93. "Did you know?" "Scientists say the greatest flood in recent history of the planet occurred near the present-day site of Spokane, Wash., about 13,000 years ago. The last of the great ice sheets was melting, and a tongue of ice blocked the release of water. The site of present-day Missoula, Mont., was in a lake 950 feet deep, and when the ice dam broke, 500 cubic miles of water spilled westward into Washington."
K.C. STAR, 1990-93. "Did you know?" "Scientists learn about long-ago floods by studying silt deposits. When a river floods, debris is carried into the mouths of streams downriver. By digging pits near the mouths of these streams, a series of layers of silt and wood are revealed, these layers then are dated through radioactive carbon. Knowing past flooding history can give hints to future flood problems."
"Parade Magazine", 7/15/90, STAR. "Ask Marilyn" "How old is the earth? - D. Johnson, Canton, N.C." "No one really knows. Back in the 1600s, people thought the earth, was only 5600 years old, based on the calculations of Archbishop Ussher, who was considered the authority on such matters. By the 1800s, that figure had grown to 40 million - or so maintained a highly prominent physicist, Lord Kelvin, irritating the living daylights out of Charles Darwin, who was convinced that the figure was even higher. The current estimate, measured by dating meteorites, stands at 4.5 billion years. The longer we pay attention to it, the older the earth seems to get."
K.C. STAR, 1/2/91. "Writers call for a truce in war between theology, science" "Book Review" By David Crumm. "Portraits of Creation: Biblical and Scientific Perspectives on the World's Formation, by Howard Van Till, Robert Snow, John Stek, and Davis Young." "Genesis and the Big Bang", by Gerald Schroeder" - "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth". For centuries, that ancient affirmation has been a declaration of war between faith and science. The debate is so old it's become a cliche in movies and novels: Evangelists aim their hottest blasts of hellfire and brimstone at science; skeptical scientists drizzle their bitter wit over witless fundamentalists. Now two new books - one by a Jewish physicist and the other by a team of Christian scientists - call eloquently for a truce. Both books argue that the war over creation was a mistake, based on equal parts of bad science and bad theology. God did create the Earth, the scientists say, and science can be God's ally. "We are called to demonstrate that Christian faith and sound scholarship are not at war with one another - that Christian faith is neither dependent upon ignorance nor threatened by knowledge about the world of which we are a part", physicist Howard Van Till concludes in 'Portraits of Creation'. Van Till and his three co-authors are reporting from the front lines of the war where the bullets of fundamentalists have whistled over their heads. All four of them are connected with Calvin College, a Grand Rapids school owned by the Christian Reformed Church.
"Tenured professors at Calvin must sign pledges that they will uphold church doctrine, which includes a fairly literal interpretation of the Bible. Despite that pledge, Van Till has tried for many years to budge church members off the notion that the Earth was created in six 24-hour days. He became a target for disgruntled traditionalists in the church. As a result, in 1987 Calvin officials conducted a major investigation into Van Till's work and the work of his co-author, geologist Davis Young, as well as a third scientist, Clarence Mennings. In 1988, the officials finally cleared the three professors with a stern warning: Don't go any further in questioning the literal nature of biblical events or characters; and, specifically, don't touch the story of Adam and Eve. The scientists seem to have heeded that advice. In "portraits of Creation', they tell readers that they are unable to question either the truth of the Adam and Eve story or human evolution in general. They claim it is because "we simply did not have enough time to address these more complex matters", but one wonders whether they did not have enough nerve. Despite that flaw, their book is fascinating, conciliatory look at many skirmishes within the long-running battle. Among the most interesting is Young's chapter on the discovery by modern geologists that the planet probably was not covered by a worldwide flood, as a literal reading of the Bible suggests. For centuries, scientists performed mental cartwheels in their attempts to prove that a global flood could have taken place, Young explains.
"One scientist claimed that the flood was caused, not by rain, but by water shooting upward from beneath the Earth's crust; another claimed that God had stored up his flood water in caves. A growing majority of Americans seem to agree with Van Till and his colleagues that a literal belief in a six-day creation and a global flood are not essential to their faith. According to years of research by George Gallup Jr., the vast majority of Americans own Bibles and believe in God but the part who believe the Bible is literally true has dwindled from 65 percent in 1963 to 31 percent last year. The other new book, Genesis and the Big Bang' by physicist Gerald Schroeder, wants to have it both ways. The main argument in Schroeder's shorter book is that Albert Einstein's theory of relativity can be adapted to prove that both scientists and fundamentalists are correct. Because of the extraordinary physics involved in the Big Bang, Schroeder claims, creation counted as 15 billion years in some parts of the universe, but it literally counted as only six days on Earth. It's a complicated argument, filled with flashy bits of theology and science, but Schroeder never does explain exactly how he performs this mathematical sleight of hand."
K.C. STAR, 8/28/98. "Earth once was a ball of ice, findings suggest" By Robert S. Boyd. Washington - "While humanity worries about global warming, scientists have uncovered new evidence that Earth once may have been a "snowball" almost completely wrapped in snow and ice. According to this theory, between 750 million and 550 million years ago our planet repeatedly got so cold that the oceans froze from the poles all the way to the equator, then thawed in a sudden greenhouse effect. The periods of deep freeze lasted about 10 million years, killing most of the primitive organisms then alive, according to Paul Hoffman, a professor of geology at Harvard University in Cambridge, mass. During the subsequent warm spells, the hardy survivors gave birth to a stupendous variety of complex life forms, Hoffman said in an interview and in an article published this week in the journal 'Science'. A snowball Earth followed by extreme greenhouse conditions" would help explain the evolution of new, complex species - "a problem that has bedeviled biologists since before Charles Darwin", he said. Here is what Hoffman and fellow geologists at Harvard and the University of Maryland believe happened: From 1 billion to 750 million years ago, there was only one supercontinent. Rodinia, surrounded by a vast ocean covering 70 percent of the globe. Then Rodinia began to break up into smaller continents, creating many more miles of shoreline. One result was that more of the carbon in living organisms was buried in the sea.
"Volcanoes, the main source of carbon, could not provide enough to maintain the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that was needed to keep the Earth warm. As a result, the polar ice caps expanded, covering a large portion of the surface with glaciers. At that point, global cooling kicked into high gear because ice, being white, reflects heat back into space much more efficiently than darker colors. This is known as the albedo effect, from a Latin word for whiteness. "If more snow reflects more sunlight back into space, this soon causes runaway glaciation", Hoffman said. "The ocean freezes over. There is mass mortality, but there are survivors". The ice age cannot last, however. Volcanoes keep belching out carbon, which the frozen ocean can't absorb. Carbon dioxide gradually builds up in the atmosphere until the Earth begins to warm again. The ice melts, releasing water vapor, another potent greenhouse gas. Open, less reflective water returns. "Then all hell breaks loose", Hoffman said. "The meltback is extraordinarily rapid. It could be less than 1,000 years. Now the survivors have to face the heat". Such a catastrophic event, producing a radically different environment, is what biologists believe forces the evolution of new species."
The Bible explains the Coming Judgement Day Fire, and now we are seeing that Man will be the ones that set it up, just as Man set up the Planetary Flood. We have to understand 'literally' that the Noah/Atlantis Planetary Flood, set down our top strata that science studies today, but this can 'not' be called millions of years, as it was a recent happening in the History of Man on Earth. Religion can 'not' trace back to the Garden of Eden, on a map, as it was before the Flood also; the Continents were broke apart, when the Ice-crystal Canopy broke, because of the misuse of the High Tech of the Noah/Atlantis Society. The new rivers and land mass are not like the Original Rivers and Land Mass. Noah and the survivors repopulated the Earth, from the Mid-East and around the Temperate Zone, before spreading North or South as the Ice at the Poles melted. Atlantis split apart and sank. Our Continents were Split apart, and sank, to make the Arctic and Atlantic Ocean, during the Noah/Atlantis Planetary Flood, not the split that Science projects. The tidal wave action of the Flood, set down the different layers of the new strata. With a High Tech translation, the Bible is a code book for the literal 6000 year history of Earth.
There is a lot of evolution memory in our genetics, so maybe Man did evolve somewhere else in the Universe, but on Earth the High Tech Species of Man colonized Earth. Until we had regained the High Tech knowledge, all ideas, religious and scientific, have had to be called theory. Now we can prove with our High Tech knowledge how a Planet can be colonized, combining religious, scientific and mythological teachings from the Past. When Man 'fell' to Heterosexual Body Birth, they lost their High Tech, and reverted back to their animal nature of Heterosexual reproduction, that has caused all the problems on our Home Planet, that are not allowed on a High Tech Planet. Reproducing Body Birth Heterosexuals are the Satan on Earth; all that they reproduce are genetic dysfunctional Bodies to Life in. Are we ready to control the male seed, that is the Original Cause of Misbreeding? Are we ready to accept we are descendant from our HTA, instead of from animals? Are we ready to change from the Selfish/Killer Lifestyle, and adjust to the High Tech Selfhood/Caretaker Lifestyle of Asexual Equal Birth, Equal Sharing, and Eternal Physical Life?